[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#189343: tetex-doc: poor Description:



Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:

> It is. There are some wishlist bugs about splitting xdvi off from
> tetex-bin as it seems to be one of the few programs in tetex-bin,

It really only xdvi and

> which depends on xlibs. The other program is that /usr/bin/mfw
> (Metafont with support for displaying generated characters).

mfw:

frank@alhambra:~$ for file in `dlocate -L tetex-bin | grep bin/ `; do file $file | grep "shared libs" >/dev/null&&  ldd $file | grep libX >/dev/null&& echo $file; done
/usr/bin/mfw
/usr/bin/xdvi.real
/usr/bin/oxdvi.real
frank@alhambra:~$ 

But then xdvi wouldn't be an appropriate name for the package, rather
tetex-bin-x11. 

Bye, Frank

-- 
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie




Reply to: