[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#180338: marked as done (tetex-base: Conflicts with old tetex-extra (to be replaced next in install run))



Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:47:37 -0500
with message-id <E18kdBp-0004RH-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#180297: fixed in tetex-base 2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2003 10:27:54 +0000
>From thue@thue.kollegiegaarden.dk Sun Feb 09 04:27:54 2003
Return-path: <thue@thue.kollegiegaarden.dk>
Received: from mail.kollegiegaarden.dk [194.239.210.251] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18hogi-0000AN-00; Sun, 09 Feb 2003 04:27:53 -0600
Received: from debian (kg35.kollegiegaarden.dk [194.239.210.35])
	by mail.kollegiegaarden.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 282EEF31D; Sun,  9 Feb 2003 11:02:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from thue by debian with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18hogc-0000en-00; Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:27:46 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Thue Janus Kristensen <thue@diku.dk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: Conflicts with old tetex-extra (to be replaced next in
	install run)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:27:46 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E18hogc-0000en-00@debian>
Sender: Thue Janus Kristensen <thue@thue.kollegiegaarden.dk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: normal


When apt-get upgrading I got this error (Sorry for the Danish):

Udpakker erstatning tetex-base...
dpkg: fejl under behandling af /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_2.0-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
 forsøger at overskrive '/etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map', som også er i pakken tetex-extra
dpkg-deb: underproces paste dræbt af signal (Røret blev brudt)
Gør klar til at erstatte tetex-extra 1.0.2+20021025-7 (ved brug af .../tetex-extra_2.0-1_all.deb)...
Udpakker erstatning tetex-extra...
Gør klar til at erstatte fileutils 4.5.6-1 (ved brug af .../fileutils_4.5.6-2_all.deb)...

It seems you need to install tetex-extra first. When I ran "apt-get install -f" tetex-extra
was already installed and tetex-base installed fine.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.20 #1 fre nov 29 11:31:20 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=da_DK.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.ISO-8859-1

Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.2.23     Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                          1.10.9     Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  texinfo                       4.3-1      Documentation system for on-line i

-- debconf information:
* tetex-base/oldcfg: true
  tetex-base/oldupdm: true


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 180297-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2003 04:50:52 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sun Feb 16 22:50:51 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18kdEx-0005kS-00; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:50:51 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18kdBp-0004RH-00; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:47:37 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 180297-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.32 $
Subject: Bug#180297: fixed in tetex-base 2.0-2
Message-Id: <E18kdBp-0004RH-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:47:37 -0500
Delivered-To: 180297-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_2.0-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0-2.diff.gz
tetex-base_2.0-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0-2.dsc
tetex-base_2.0-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_2.0-2_all.deb
tetex-doc_2.0-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_2.0-2_all.deb
tetex-extra_2.0-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_2.0-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 180297@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:23:47 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description: 
 tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
 tetex-doc  - teTeX documentation
 tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 180297 180360 180400 180600 180770
Changes: 
 tetex-base (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed dependency and setup-conffiles.  [kohda]
     (Closes: #180360, #180297, #180600)
   * Fixed postrm so /etc/texdoctk should be removed at purge.  Also old
     dat files would be removed with debconf.  [kohda]  (Closes: #180400)
   * Fixed handling of generated files with updmap; now they were not conffiles
     but configuration files and only installed when they didn't exist.
     [kohda]  (Closes: #180770)
   * Fixed Description.  [kohda]
Files: 
 4cf3ac7997e20d4498d36575829b7597 786 tex optional tetex-base_2.0-2.dsc
 1942da504935e88a40d9ff0f6e7ae79d 39413 tex optional tetex-base_2.0-2.diff.gz
 6dd9d12339eeffbf50fbdbe0e987da37 13906088 tex optional tetex-base_2.0-2_all.deb
 e097bf47c2f0f895d18d869f7994d0fb 10338868 tex optional tetex-extra_2.0-2_all.deb
 5daa36dc217e3b5e25a9323ca8db824c 27216814 tex optional tetex-doc_2.0-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+UGMy1IXdL1v6kOwRAmocAJ46LZXBq9b66iWvQVxjXwrmda4IqwCfSaB2
qUgnlhr7QFIbG5S8MeCPKOQ=
=tKGp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: