[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#180489: marked as forwarded (tetex-bin: dvipdfm moved into tetex-bin, dvipdft no longer exists)



Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:29:54 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20030212.082954.07644783.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
has caused the Debian Bug report #180489,
regarding tetex-bin: dvipdfm moved into tetex-bin, dvipdft no longer exists
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) tetex@informatik.uni-hannover.de.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 180489-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2003 23:30:06 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Tue Feb 11 17:30:06 2003
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.140] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18ijqn-0005HL-00; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:30:05 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
	by civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18ijqg-00016N-00; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:29:58 +0900
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:29:54 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20030212.082954.07644783.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: tetex@informatik.uni-hannover.de
Cc: 180489-forwarded@bugs.debian.org, 180489-submitter@bugs.debian.org,
 kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp
Subject: dvipdft is missing?
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 180489-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0
	tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi all,

We, tetex maintainers of Debian, got the bug which said
that teTeX 2.0 included dvipdfm but a wrapper script
dvipdft was missing (in the teTeX 2.0 source tree).

civic:~/misc/pack/teTeX/ORIG$ tar ztvf tetex-src-2.0.tar.gz | grep dvipdft
civic:~/misc/pack/teTeX/ORIG$ 

Apparently, dvipdft was referenced in a manual page of dvipdfm.
Is there any chance that dvipdft will be included in teTeX?

Best regards,			 2003.2.12(Wed)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima



Reply to: