Bug#180297: tetex-base: should replace tetex-extra (<< 2.0)

[Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>]

severity 180338 importanr
merge 180338 180297
thanks

From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#180297: tetex-base: should replace tetex-extra (<< 2.0)
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 17:53:25 -0500

> Attempting to upgrade tetex-base with tetex-extra 1.0.2+20021025-7
> installed yields
> 
> > Preparing to replace tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-7 (using .../tetex-base_2.0-1_all.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement tetex-base ...
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_2.0-1_all.deb (--unpack):
> >  trying to overwrite `/etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map', which is also in package tetex-extra
> > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> 
> This does not occur with tetex-extra upgraded to 2.0-1, so a versioned
> Replaces: should suffice.
> 
> Likewise, tetex-doc should replace tetex-base (<< 2.0-1):

Ah, yes bsr-interpolated.map (and bsr.map) were moved from
tetex-extra to tetex-base.  This was caused by the upstream 
change of directory structure.

> > Preparing to replace tetex-doc 1.0.2+20021025-7 (using .../tetex-doc_2.0-1_all.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement tetex-doc ...
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-doc_2.0-1_all.deb (--unpack):
> >  trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/texmf/amstex/README.gz', which is also in package tetex-base
> > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> 
> occurs with tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-7 but not with 2.0-1.

I didn't noticed this.  This is perhaps because rules was rewritten
in this version and the current one seemed much precise (i.e.
amstex/README.gz would be much natural in tetex-doc than in
tetex-base).

Thanks for your report and the bug was fixed already in CVS 
repository.
				2003-2-9(Sun)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.