[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#179487: marked as done (tetex-bin: pdflatex don't overwrite existing pdf files)



Your message dated Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:33:26 +0000
with message-id <20030204183326.GF1729@polya>
and subject line Bug#179487: tetex-bin: pdflatex don't overwrite existing pdf files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2003 17:57:12 +0000
>From NAHOO82@telefonica.net Sun Feb 02 11:57:11 2003
Return-path: <NAHOO82@telefonica.net>
Received: from imap.infonegocio.com (telesmtp2.mail.isp) [213.4.129.150] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18fOMh-00008N-00; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 11:57:11 -0600
Received: from 81-203-230-84.user.ono.com ([81.203.230.84]) by
          telesmtp2.mail.isp (terra.es) with ESMTP id H9P0J402.0UW for
          <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:57:04 +0100 
Subject: tetex-bin: pdflatex don't overwrite existing pdf files
From: Ruben Porras <nahoo82@telefonica.net>
To: "bugs.debian" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Organization: 
Message-Id: <[🔎] 1044208970.740.16.camel@nahoo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 
Date: 02 Feb 2003 19:02:51 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: **

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20021025-8
Severity: important

.....
Warning: pdflatex (file /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/pdftex.map): entry
for `c
mex9' already exists, duplicates ignored
}] [2 <./variables.pdf
Error: pdflatex (file ./variables.pdf): pdf inclusion: invalid font dict
type <
null>
 ==> Fatal error occurred, the output PDF file is not finished!


then I do "rm variables.pdf" and then rerun pdflatex, the result is a
normal operation.

Warning: pdflatex (file /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/pdftex.map): entry
for `c
mex9' already exists, duplicates ignored
} <./variables.jpg>]

......

Output written on variables.pdf (2 pages, 255009 bytes).
Transcript written on variables.log.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nahoo 2.4.20 #1 sáb ene 18 15:10:04 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debconf                 1.2.21           Debian configuration
management sy
ii  debianutils             2.2              Miscellaneous utilities
specific t
ii  dpkg                    1.10.9           Package maintenance system
for Deb
ii  ed                      0.2-19           The classic unix line
editor
ii  libc6                   2.3.1-10         GNU C Library: Shared
libraries an
ii  libkpathsea3            1.0.7+20021025-8 shared libkpathsea for
teTeX
ii  libpng12-0              1.2.5-10         PNG library - runtime
ii  libwww0                 5.4.0-5          The W3C WWW library
ii  libxaw7                 4.2.1-5          X Athena widget set library
ii  t1lib1                  1.3.1-1          Type 1 font rasterizer
library - r
ii  tetex-base              1.0.2+20021025-7 basic teTeX library files
ii  xlibs                   4.2.1-5          X Window System client
libraries
ii  zlib1g                  1:1.1.4-9        compression library -
runtime

-- debconf information:
* tetex-bin/cnf_name: 
* tetex-bin/userperm: false
  tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
* tetex-bin/groupname: users
* tetex-bin/groupperm: true
* tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true


-- 


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 179487-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2003 18:34:40 +0000
>From jdg@polya.uklinux.net Tue Feb 04 12:34:39 2003
Return-path: <jdg@polya.uklinux.net>
Received: from mail2.uklinux.net [80.84.72.32] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18g7u3-0004PP-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:34:39 -0600
Received: from polya (bts-0614.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.50.102])
	by mail2.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E594409FB0
	for <179487-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue,  4 Feb 2003 18:34:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18g7ss-0000xG-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 18:33:26 +0000
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:33:26 +0000
From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@polya.uklinux.net>
To: 179487-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#179487: tetex-bin: pdflatex don't overwrite existing pdf files
Message-ID: <20030204183326.GF1729@polya>
References: <[🔎] 1044208970.740.16.camel@nahoo> <[🔎] 20030203122609.GJ926@polya> <[🔎] 1044298849.833.39.camel@nahoo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1044298849.833.39.camel@nahoo>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: 179487-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.1 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Ruben Porras wrote:
> > Please send a minimal example .tex file which exhibits this problem!
> > This information is inadequate to recreate the problem.
> > 
> 
> this is a minimal example, finitas.tex:
> 
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{graphicx}
> \begin{document}
> \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{finitas}
> \end{document}
> 
> 
> I've have discovered the exact problem:
> the file's name is finitas(.tex), the same as the image, which is
> finitas(.jpg)
> 
> After seeing the cause, this isn't really an important problem, maybe
> you can assign it a normal priority?

No, I'm going to close the bug report: you have to use the command:

\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{finitas.jpg}

for otherwise, how does pdflatex know what file extension to use?
There is a default list, and the order is: .png, .pdf, .jpg, .mps and
possibly .tif as well.  But why rely on this when you can specify it
correctly?

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

        Julian Gilbey, website: http://www.polya.uklinux.net/
   Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
     Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry



Reply to: