On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:55:40PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda scrawled: > From: Simon Law <sfllaw@engmail.uwaterloo.ca> > Subject: Bug#175606: Modified postinst > Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 22:56:01 -0500 > > > > Did you do fresh installation of tetex-* or upgrading ? > > > > Upgrading. > > That's very weird. > > From: Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au> > Subject: Bug#175606: Modified postinst > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:02:05 +1100 > > > So it works both ways ... the fixed tetex-base should probably thus be > > rushed into unstable ASAP. > > Hmm, but unnecessary mktexlsr might be called ... Well, better than killing build(d)s. ;) > Anyway, thanks for your reports, they are very useful > for me. So have we arrived at a solution yet? Do you need more information? :) d -- Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
Attachment:
pgpM8ozuwrxqC.pgp
Description: PGP signature