Bug#175381: marked as done (weird debconf note)
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2003 08:02:27 -0500
with message-id <E18VWtf-0003Nt-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#175381: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2003 01:46:43 +0000
>From jordi@oskuro.net Sat Jan 04 19:46:42 2003
Return-path: <jordi@oskuro.net>
Received: from 213-96-69-115.uc.nombres.ttd.es (natura.oskuro.net) [213.96.69.115]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18UzsA-0003Ah-00; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 19:46:42 -0600
Received: from nubol.int.oskuro.net (nubol.int.oskuro.net [192.168.1.3])
by natura.oskuro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5449927881; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 02:46:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nubol.int.oskuro.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F1D2370A741; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 02:46:09 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: weird debconf note
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 02:46:09 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20030105014609.F1D2370A741@nubol.int.oskuro.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0.2+20021025-3
Severity: normal
Hello,
With today's upgrade, tetex-base showed a debconf question with some bad
looking text:
Remove these files?
Remove old conffiles
Yes No
Basically, the "Remove old conffiles" line should be removed.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nubol 2.4.20 #1 Fri Jan 3 21:40:25 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.9 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii texinfo 4.3-1 Documentation system for on-line i
-- debconf information:
* tetex-base/oldcfg: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 175381-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2003 13:05:50 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Mon Jan 06 07:05:49 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18VWwv-0004Jq-00; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 07:05:49 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18VWtf-0003Nt-00; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 08:02:27 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 175381-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $
Subject: Bug#175381: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-5
Message-Id: <E18VWtf-0003Nt-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 08:02:27 -0500
Delivered-To: 175381-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5.diff.gz
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5.dsc
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 175381@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2002 12:12:32 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20021025-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
tetex-doc - teTeX documentation
tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 175381
Changes:
tetex-base (1.0.2+20021025-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fixed templates. [kohda] (Closes: #175381)
* Fixed handling of psfonts.map, pdftex.map; if possible, used updmap now.
[kohda]
Files:
018b1f0b34404069d5f1a282f92f0691 807 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5.dsc
a4ee7b10fc4f78f05fc21f46981858c5 37833 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5.diff.gz
ca34fbd14313e3be693d9207e7735ded 17527730 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
6370d19fff9e70c629fd50176c62e739 10374074 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
ee9952c62ad98dcc821932e259ad8e94 21100228 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-5_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+GXQD1IXdL1v6kOwRAse7AJ9kJ0d8yya0uYt31dHrRZf+mjQG7gCdHiPH
N/wYn0p5MeIdDIyN8nNdHgs=
=yxpw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: