[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#165732: marked as done (tetex-base: pool_size and hash_extra in texmf.cnf are too restrictive)



Your message dated Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:32:41 -0500
with message-id <E18HgZl-0001AG-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#165732: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2002 12:20:11 +0000
>From ujr@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de Mon Oct 21 07:20:09 2002
Return-path: <ujr@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de>
Received: from postman.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.87] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 183bXU-0003P8-00; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:20:08 -0500
Received: from p6 (Ab275.pppool.de [213.6.178.117])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by postman.arcor-online.net (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g9LCK5Ig008463
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:20:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler" <ujr@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base: pool_size and hash_extra in texmf.cnf are too restrictive
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:20:05 +0200
Message-ID: <NEBBLMJPMLEFGFJIGEGJCELBCBAA.ujr@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OUTLOOK
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tetex-base
Version: current stable/unstable
Severity: normal

Hi,

 as has been turned out from a lot of postings to the german TeX
 newsgroup de.comp.text.tex, a couple of settings in texmf.cnf,
 most notably pool_size and hash_extra, are too small for only
 slightly complex documents which use newer packages like hyperref.

 Please increase all affected values - today's computers shouldn't
 have problems with much larger settings.

 Thanks,
  Ulf


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 165732-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2002 08:38:17 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Fri Nov 29 02:38:17 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18HgfB-0003FB-00; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:38:17 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18HgZl-0001AG-00; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:32:41 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 165732-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $
Subject: Bug#165732: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-2
Message-Id: <E18HgZl-0001AG-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:32:41 -0500
Delivered-To: 165732-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2.diff.gz
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2.dsc
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 165732@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:15:02 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20021025-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description: 
 tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
 tetex-doc  - teTeX documentation
 tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 61293 141988 159939 165732 167920 169799 169937
Changes: 
 tetex-base (1.0.2+20021025-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added lost directories at cvs-upgrade.  [kohda]
   * Removed very obsolete 'babel' from Conflicts/Replaces entries.  This was
     a bug of serious, so we should fix this.  [kohda]  (Closes: #169799)
   * Changed the condition in postinst from "if [ ! -e /usr/share/texmf/doc ]"
     to "if [ ! -L /usr/share/texmf/doc ]"  This might fix #170592  [kohda]
   * Now remove /etc/texmf (and /var/cache/fonts) at purge by postrm.  [kohda]
     (Closes: #61293)
   * Setted Conflicts/Replace with old tetex-bin because prologues for dvips
     was moved in tetex-bin now.
   * ttlkeys.def was included in the upstream source so I stopped fiddling
     with it.  [kohda]
   * Added cspsfonts (tetex-base) and revtex4 (tetex-extra) to Conflicts
     field.  [kohda]  (Closes: #159939, #169937)
   * Following bugs could be closed.  [kohda]
    - newhelpindex.html could display the links.  (closes: #141988)
    - pool size was large enough.  (closes: #165732)
    - installed booktabs again.  (closes: #167920)
Files: 
 ee081e3aee9407c20bf736dfdf6aa36c 807 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2.dsc
 9fac5b8f2c006a63248cad1d045101fd 35194 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2.diff.gz
 76409ff17883faf7b66a4e0379cb4d90 17695442 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb
 6ffa2f533e9f8e7be999d740534eea66 10317094 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb
 95c13643b66830d6c01a9fb98b442ff8 21189170 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE95w7F1IXdL1v6kOwRAttIAJkBadygIpaqN0waFTK0GZgT4SnrbgCaA0+d
X2vu60dqE59typYfLbKqn4c=
=4CMd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: