[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#139937: marked as done (tetex-src: Missing mt11p.dtx)



Your message dated Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:50:08 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20021128.175008.112596517.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line fixed in tetex-src of 20021025 version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2002 01:08:03 +0000
>From c@eskimo.com Mon Mar 25 19:08:03 2002
Return-path: <c@eskimo.com>
Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net) [207.217.120.74] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16pfRR-0001F4-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 19:08:01 -0600
Received: from pppa1-city-5r7446.dialinx.net ([4.47.9.190] helo=diziet.clawpaws.net)
	by falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 16pfRM-00070J-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:07:56 -0800
Received: from diziet.clawpaws.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by diziet.clawpaws.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g2Q17jGr010012;
	Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:07:45 -0800
Message-Id: <200203260107.g2Q17jGr010012@diziet.clawpaws.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "C.M. Connelly" <c@eskimo.com>
From: "C.M. Connelly" <c+debbugs@eskimo.com>
Reply-To: "C.M. Connelly" <c+debbugs@eskimo.com>
Organization: Sam Hill Cabal, DS
Subject: tetex-src: Missing mt11p.dtx
X-Mailer: mh-e 6.0; nmh 1.0.4+dev; Emacs 21.1
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:07:45 -0800
Sender: c@eskimo.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org



Package: tetex-src
Version: tetex-src-1.0.2+20011202-1
Severity: important

The file mt11p.dtx is not available in tetex-src, which violates
the distribution conditions for mt11p.sty (in tetex-extra) and
mt11p.dvi (in tetex-doc).

Note that I am hoping to persuade the author, Drahoslav L'im, to
relicense the package.  If we're going to distribute the file,
however, we should have the source available in the tetex-src
package.

Note: The file is available from CTAN at /tex-archive/fonts/mt11p/.

System information
==================

Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux diziet 2.2.19-fal #2 Mon Apr 30 18:15:17 PDT 2001 ppc



Versions of packages tetex-src depends on:

<none>



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 139937-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2002 08:50:13 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Thu Nov 28 02:50:12 2002
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.142] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18HKNA-0003Lg-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 02:50:12 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
	by nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18HKN9-0000Rj-00
	for <139937-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:50:11 +0900
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:50:08 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20021128.175008.112596517.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: 139937-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in tetex-src of 20021025 version
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 139937-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0
	tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Now mt11p.dtx is present in the latest tetex-src
so I close this one.

Thanks,			2002/11/28

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.



Reply to: