[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#148537: marked as done (FTBFS: Build failure of tetex-base on i386)



Your message dated Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:19:41 -0500
with message-id <E18DzrR-0000kk-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#148537: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2002 08:00:16 +0000
>From dancer@netfort.gr.jp Thu May 30 03:00:16 2002
Return-path: <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17DKr1-0002aw-00; Thu, 30 May 2002 03:00:15 -0500
Received: from atoron (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id QAA16003
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 30 May 2002 16:59:44 +0900
X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be atoron
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 17:00:16 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
To: submit bug tracking system <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of tetex-base on i386
Message-Id: <20020530170016.797b6b55.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Organization: Netfort project
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-3


tetex-base fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build.

I am just filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your
package from source. This is actually a serious bug, it will be
upgraded to "serious" severity after woody is released

This build was done using pbuilder package.


Build log follows:
===========================================
Sorry, fakeroot is already the newest version.
Sorry, fakeroot is already the newest version.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
 -> Building the package
su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info.
(Ignored)
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is tetex-base
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.0.2+20011202-3
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is C.M. Connelly <cmc@debian.org>
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
# Make sure all of our expected symlinks are in place
debian/restore-symlinks
/bin/bash: debian/restore-symlinks: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied
make: *** [clean] Error 126
pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package
===========================================


The following patch should fix the build failure
==================================================
diff -ru tetex-base-1.0.2+20011202-orig/debian/rules tetex-base-1.0.2+20011202/debian/rules
--- tetex-base-1.0.2+20011202-orig/debian/rules Thu May 30 16:58:28 2002
+++ tetex-base-1.0.2+20011202/debian/rules      Thu May 30 16:59:24 2002
@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@
 build:
        dh_testdir
        # Make sure all of our expected symlinks are in place
-       debian/restore-symlinks
+       sh debian/restore-symlinks
 #      make
        touch build
 
 clean:
        dh_testdir
        # Make sure all of our expected symlinks are in place
-       debian/restore-symlinks
+       sh debian/restore-symlinks
        dh_testroot
        -rm -f build
 #      -make clean


regards,
   junichi


-- 
dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer




---------------------------------------
Received: (at 148537-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2002 04:23:24 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Mon Nov 18 22:23:23 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18Dzv1-0008Uo-00; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:23:23 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18DzrR-0000kk-00; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:19:41 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 148537-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $
Subject: Bug#148537: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-1
Message-Id: <E18DzrR-0000kk-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:19:41 -0500
Delivered-To: 148537-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1.diff.gz
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1.dsc
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025.orig.tar.gz
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 148537@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:00:03 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20021025-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description: 
 tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
 tetex-doc  - teTeX documentation
 tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 132232 132237 148537 165733
Changes: 
 tetex-base (1.0.2+20021025-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Upstream Release (20021025 beta version).
    - web2c 7.3.9 in 20021025 version.  (Closes: #165733)
    - context would work.  (Closes: #132232, #132237)
   * Used the original tarball and applied necesary patches explicitly
     to clarify our modifications but removed bad-license-files already
     from .orig.tar.gz  [kohda]
   * Removed obsolete /var/spool/texmf and added /var/cache/fonts (debian/dirs)
     [kohda]
   * Added conffiles of dvips as possible as I could do.
     (with debian/setup-conffiles) [kohda]
    - utopia.map was removed in upstream (20021017)
   * List explicitly already removed bad license files in the upstream source
     in README.Debian  [kohda]
   * bookstabs, picinpar.sty were added because the license problems were
     cleared.  [kohda]
   * Refined mktexlsr handling in postinst/postrm files.  [kohda]
   * Modified restore-symlinks a bit.  [kohda]
   * Modified remove-bad-license-files a bit  [kohda]
   * Added pxfonts, txfonts, mfpic, texdoctk, tetex-eurosym to a field of
     Conflicts/Replaces.  Thanks to Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>.  [kohda]
    - removed Suggests: texdoctk from tetex-doc.
   * Added and updated ttlkeys.def, and installed it by rules.  But ttlps.def
     was now present in original.  [kohda]
   * Added code to debian/rules to chmod our extra scripts to be executable
     [cmc] (Closes: #148537)
Files: 
 9852efcef85ee2f5ba3bfba6a709a4d6 807 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1.dsc
 85574c8e949e464a3d25d5cf2533d473 49422825 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025.orig.tar.gz
 4706f1407ab2a8681f1ba4d529bf18d4 34662 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1.diff.gz
 414bf0fdcc9d8d1debd7ef8759df9570 17691670 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb
 56c0f203387e43514ba4511192cd43ca 10315710 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb
 0063bc9d924d1018c3b198313668f4fb 21188982 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQE92ai/1IXdL1v6kOwRAloEAJUUpBDPl8nx4rIzyWkc8TojP7tjAJsHG0Bt
KOvfJv+xqaXR3oXEGtFOyQ==
=ud4p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: