[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#165732: [patch] pool size is too small



tags 165732 + patch
severity 165732 important
thanks

As has been stated, too small pool size is making default Tetex install
to be very limited.

Any efforts to circumvent this by a documentation package tends to
back-fire by receiving FTBFS RC bug from Junichi or failing to build on
stable DDP web site.  (Now I have ifdef in Makefile.  See Bug#167049)

I think export TEXMFCNF= trick is bad since when you release new TEX, it
tends to break.  If fixed I will make more documentation to make PDF and
PS.  Most Debian documentation are without PS due to this problem.  (I
saw some include already build ones in source tree.  That's a hack if
tou have tex/sgml source.)

Usable default is a GOOD thing. Let make all sizes at least 4 times.
memory is cheap.  Nobody run TEX in i486  :)

If you are making another release for Sarge into unstable, please
consider followings:

Please add /etc/texmf/texmf.d/90larger-pool from tetex-extra or
tetex-base with following contents.

---
% everything multiplied by 4 :)  More space.
% Max number of characters in all strings, including all error messages,
% help texts, font names, control sequences.  These values apply to TeX and MP.
pool_size.context = 3000000
pool_size = 500000
% Minimum pool space after TeX/MP's own strings; must be at least
% 25000 less than pool_size, but doesn't need to be nearly that large.
string_vacancies.context = 180000
string_vacancies = 100000
% Maximum number of strings.
max_strings.context = 220000
max_strings = 60000
% min pool space left after loading .fmt
pool_free.context = 190000
pool_free = 20000
---
-- 
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
        Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>   Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
 .''`.  Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
 : :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
 `. `'  "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract




Reply to: