[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#148171: tetex-bin: Why is context only partially included?



Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20011202-7
Severity: normal

Context seems to be partially included, isn't it?
Some files are there, that is, and some are missing...
Thus the line in /etc/texmf/fmtutil.cnf,
#cont-de        pdfetex         cont-usr.tex    *cont-de.ini
Does not work...
- there is no cont-de.ini included
- there is no cont-usr.tex included

BUT:
- upstream cont-de.ini only inputs cont-de.tex - and that file is
included...
- there is a file cont-usr.ori - which seems to do the job fine...

Could you please add context properly to the package?
Thanks.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bombadil.xmldesign.de 2.4.19-pre8-jp13 #2 Mon Mai 20 22:20:49 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debianutils             1.16.2           Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg                    1.9.21           Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed                      0.2-19           The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6                   2.2.5-6          GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libkpathsea3            1.0.7+20011202-7 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii  libpng2                 1.0.12-3         PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2  1:2.95.4-9       The GNU stdc++ library
ii  libtiff3g               3.5.5-6          Tag Image File Format library
ii  libxaw7                 4.1.0-16         X Athena widget set library
ii  tetex-base              1.0.2+20011202-3 basic teTeX library files
ii  xlibs                   4.1.0-16         X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                  1:1.1.4-1        compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tetex-maint-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: