Bug#64914: none
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp> writes:
> Note tetex-bin would provide /etc/texmf/fmt.d/00tetex.cnf
> and, for example, jadetex would provide /etc/texmf/fmt.d/10jadetex.cnf
>
> The numerics are for ordering and they will make generated
> fmtutil.cnf readable, at least.
>
> Further, jadetex should not ship out 10jadetex.cnf
> as a real file (a conffile) but should generate it
> with postinst and remove it with prerm.
>
> If not, 10jadetex.cnf will remain after a user removes
> jadetex and fmtutil.cnf will contain unnecessary entries.
Couldn't I just modify the 10jadetex.cnf file to first check if
/usr/share/texmf/tex/jadetex/base/jadetex.ltx is there? I personally
would much prefer to do that.
BTW, I'm very glad this is getting done. It should take care of a
continual source of bogus bugs on jadetex.
Anyhow, either way, it's not a huge deal. Is this change accepted
into tetex yet? Can someone ping me that it's in there?
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: