[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#87699: marked as done (tetex-bin should depend on texi2html, at least in woody.)



Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2002 08:47:21 -0500
with message-id <E16hWKf-0000UM-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#87699: fixed in tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2001 09:48:35 +0000
>From sanvila@unex.es Mon Feb 26 03:48:35 2001
Return-path: <sanvila@unex.es>
Received: from (smtp.wanadoo.es) [::ffff:62.36.220.21] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14XKGg-0005se-00; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 03:48:34 -0600
Received: from home.unex.es (usuario2-36-114-152.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.114.152])
	by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1Q9mWM21956
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:48:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by home.unex.es with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14XKE1-0001vS-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:45:49 +0100
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:45:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin should depend on texi2html, at least in woody.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0102261039270.7385-100000@home.unex.es>
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@unex.es
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20000807-6
Severity: important

Since texi2html is now in a separate package, people upgrading from
potato to woody will see that texi2html will disappear from the system.
I think it is unacceptable that we lose functionality after an upgrade
(i.e. that things that used to work suddenly stop working). IMHO, the best
way to prevent this is to make tetex-bin to depend on texi2html, at
least in woody, so that people having tetex-bin installed in potato
will get texi2html in woody when upgrading. After woody release this
dependency may be lowered to recommends or just suggests.

Thanks.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 87699-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2002 14:07:36 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sun Mar 03 08:07:36 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16hWeG-0007YC-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 08:07:36 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16hWKf-0000UM-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 08:47:21 -0500
From: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
To: 87699-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.8 $
Subject: Bug#87699: fixed in tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-4
Message-Id: <E16hWKf-0000UM-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 08:47:21 -0500
Delivered-To: 87699-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-bin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libkpathsea-dev_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/libkpathsea-dev_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb
libkpathsea3_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/libkpathsea3_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb
tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4.diff.gz
tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4.dsc
tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 87699@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de> (supplier of updated tetex-bin package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  3 Mar 2002 10:15:47 +0100
Source: tetex-bin
Binary: tetex-bin libkpathsea-dev libkpathsea3
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.7+20011202-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Description: 
 libkpathsea-dev - kpathsea.a and include files for teTeX
 libkpathsea3 - shared libkpathsea for teTeX
 tetex-bin  - teTeX binary files
Closes: 87699 129009 133934 135737
Changes: 
 tetex-bin (1.0.7+20011202-4) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * fix texdoc background behaviour (closes: #129009, #135737)
   * add /var/spool/texmf/ directories on install again (closes: #133934)
   * add texi2html to recommends (closes: #87699)
Files: 
 01b945b26b655987314987a26b506ca2 914 tex standard tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4.dsc
 c4452bbbc2f2f6c9406afdd8f9901d33 28008 tex standard tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4.diff.gz
 65185193105e46a07221cb4eca9b01f8 3124094 tex optional tetex-bin_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb
 2d22d5952ec8e2b5768a097cd5e00e45 39208 libs optional libkpathsea3_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb
 f7964c05a22412d8d5986e238150e2a7 62514 devel optional libkpathsea-dev_1.0.7+20011202-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjyCIWMACgkQgeVih7XOVJfXAgCfXSzkdIjj4JTUkhIYj7F5yS1e
yy8An2RLYmhjCpv++rXPoS4CWsExKmfj
=0Ky4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: