[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fixed in NMU of tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-3.2



> Can you please check with http://cvs.debian.org/tetex-bin/?cvsroot=3Dtetex
> if you did the same changes like the ones in the current cvs version I
> just prepare to release?

Actually, the patch from the diff is defective (and hence the -3.3 upload).

The following diff does things correctly.

lamont
=====================================================================
diff -ur t/tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/debian/postinst tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/debian/postinst
--- t/tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/debian/postinst	Sun Mar  3 03:41:00 2002
+++ tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/debian/postinst	Sat Mar  2 17:25:57 2002
@@ -104,6 +104,12 @@
 update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/xdvi.bin xdvi.bin /usr/bin/xdvi.real 30
 update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/oxdvi.bin oxdvi.bin /usr/bin/oxdvi.real 30
 
+dpkg-statoverride --remove /var/spool/texmf/pk >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+dpkg-statoverride --remove /var/spool/texmf/source >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+dpkg-statoverride --remove /var/spool/texmf/tfm >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+dpkg-statoverride --update --add root root 01777 /var/spool/texmf/pk
+dpkg-statoverride --update --add root root 01777 /var/spool/texmf/source
+dpkg-statoverride --update --add root root 01777 /var/spool/texmf/tfm
 
 echo
 echo If you want to change the default settings,
diff -ur t/tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/debian/postrm tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/debian/postrm
--- t/tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/debian/postrm	Sun Mar  3 03:41:00 2002
+++ tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/debian/postrm	Sat Mar  2 17:27:58 2002
@@ -12,4 +12,10 @@
 
 rm -f /usr/lib/texmf/web2c /usr/share/texmf/web2c || true
 
+if [ $1 = "remove" ]; then
+    dpkg-statoverride --remove /var/spool/texmf/pk >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+    dpkg-statoverride --remove /var/spool/texmf/source >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+    dpkg-statoverride --remove /var/spool/texmf/tfm >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+fi
+
 #DEBHELPER#
=====================================================================



Reply to: