Bug#73648: marked as done (Tetex-extra doesn't rehash the installed tex styles)
Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:04:59 +0100 (MET)
with message-id <15325.21499.151701.591974@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
and subject line Bug#73648: Tetex-extra doesn't rehash the installed tex styles
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2000 12:32:30 +0000
>From david.martinez@rediris.es Wed Oct 04 07:32:30 2000
Return-path: <david.martinez@rediris.es>
Received: from chico.rediris.es [::ffff:130.206.1.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13gnin-0005Dj-00; Wed, 04 Oct 2000 07:32:29 -0500
Received: from snuggle (snuggle.rediris.es [130.206.1.171])
by chico.rediris.es (8.11.0/8.9.1) with SMTP id e94CWKm27918
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:32:21 +0200 (MET DST)
From: David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS <david.martinez@rediris.es>
Organization: Centro de Comunicaciones CSIC/RedIRIS
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Tetex-extra doesn't rehash the installed tex styles
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:32:22 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.95.0]
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0010041432220U.17923@snuggle>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-2
I found this bug when I installed the package and tex didn't found=20
fancyvrb.sty. I have to run texconfig, and select the option rehash. Afte=
r=20
that, tex ran well.
=09The fix is to run rehash after installing tetex-extra.
System: Debian woody updated 1 Oct. (with kernel 2.4.0test8)
--=20
Responsable de News
Servicios de red - Network services
Centro de Comunicaciones CSIC/RedIris
Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development
Madrid (Spain)
Tlf 91.585.49.05
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 73648-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2001 13:04:35 +0000
>From christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de Mon Oct 29 07:04:35 2001
Return-path: <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Received: from mailgate2.zdv.uni-mainz.de [134.93.8.57]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15yC5i-0005Yb-00; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:04:34 -0600
Received: from arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.145])
by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f9TD4EX29335;
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:04:14 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from martin@localhost)
by arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f9TD50000950;
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:05:00 +0100 (MET)
From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15325.21499.151701.591974@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:04:59 +0100 (MET)
To: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>, 73648-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: david.martinez@rediris.es
Subject: Re: Bug#73648: Tetex-extra doesn't rehash the installed tex styles
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20011029113944U.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
References: <0010041432220U.17923@snuggle>
<14899.36938.778544.459604@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
<0012151441020Y.00463@snuggle>
<[🔎] 20011029113944U.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 19.34.1
Organization: Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Delivered-To: 73648-done@bugs.debian.org
Atsuhito Kohda writes:
> From: David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS <david.martinez@rediris.es>
> Subject: Bug#73648: Tetex-extra doesn't rehash the installed tex styles
> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:41:02 +0100
>
> > > texhash is run from postinst of tetex-extra.
>
> > again. If I don't find problems, you can close the bug.
>
> This should be closed, shouldn't this?
>
> It is of no help to refine tetex-extra, IMHO.
Ok.
Reply to: