Bug#80275: marked as done (libkpathsea3: tex-related packages are confused about libkpathsea3 vs. tetex-lib)
Your message dated Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:50:06 +0100 (MET)
with message-id <14940.33966.819873.934542@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
and subject line Bug#80275: libkpathsea3: tex-related packages are confused about libkpathsea3 vs. tetex-lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2000 08:23:54 +0000
>From amc@arwen.cs.berkeley.edu Fri Dec 22 02:23:54 2000
Return-path: <amc@arwen.cs.berkeley.edu>
Received: from arwen.cs.berkeley.edu [128.32.46.192]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 149NUY-0005mS-00; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:23:54 -0600
Received: from amc by arwen.cs.berkeley.edu with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian))
id 149NUX-0002PA-00; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:23:53 -0800
From: amc@cs.berkeley.edu
Subject: libkpathsea3: tex-related packages are confused about libkpathsea3 vs. tetex-lib
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
Message-Id: <E149NUX-0002PA-00@arwen.cs.berkeley.edu>
Sender: "Adam M. Costello" <amc@arwen.cs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 00:23:53 -0800
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: libkpathsea3
Version: N/A
Severity: important
libkpathsea3 conflicts with tetex-lib, but lots of tex-related packages
depend on tetex-lib, and libkpathsea3 does not provide tetex-lib. I
thought this might be a transient inconsistency, but I think it's been
like this for about a week, and it makes dselect go crazy. Should this
be considered a bug in every package that depends on tetex-lib? Should
I report all these bugs?
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux arwen 2.2.14 #4 Sat Feb 5 22:59:30 PST 2000 i686 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 80275-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2001 15:50:39 +0000
>From christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de Wed Jan 10 09:50:39 2001
Return-path: <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Received: from mailgate1.zdv.uni-mainz.de [134.93.8.56]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14GNWI-0000Yu-00; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:50:38 -0600
Received: from arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.145])
by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f0AFo9M27332;
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:50:09 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from martin@localhost)
by arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f0AFo8c04297;
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:50:08 +0100 (MET)
From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14940.33966.819873.934542@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:50:06 +0100 (MET)
To: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>, 80275-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: amc@cs.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: Bug#80275: libkpathsea3: tex-related packages are confused about libkpathsea3 vs. tetex-lib
In-Reply-To: <20001224092620F.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
References: <20001222220545.B10093@arwen.cs.berkeley.edu>
<20001223092253R.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
<20001223040930.H10093@arwen.cs.berkeley.edu>
<20001224092620F.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 19.34.1
Organization: Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz
Delivered-To: 80275-done@bugs.debian.org
Atsuhito Kohda writes:
> civic:/home/kohda# apt-cache show catdvi
> Package: catdvi
> (snip)
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.97), libkpathsea3 (>= 1.0.7+20000807-7), tetex-base
>
> It is already corrected (seems in 18 Dec 2000). I almost believe
> that my guess is correct ;-)
>
So I can close this bug now.
C
Reply to: