[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#81758: tetex-base: conflicting files between tetex-base and csplain, cspsfonts, cstexfonts



reassign 81758 cslatex
thanks

This is a bug in cslatex not tetex. 

C

c.ruffin@ieee.org writes:
 > Package: tetex-base
 > Version: 1.0.2+20000804-4
 > Severity: important
 > 
 > While installing boot-floppies, which require csplain, cstexfonts, and
 > cspsfonts, I encountered numerous errors from these packages complaining
 > that tetex-base also includes several files.  As a result, I can't install
 > csplain, cstexfonts, cspsfonts, or boot-floppies.  I'm not sure what the
 > problem is here, other than perhaps csplain/cstexfonts/cspsfonts have
 > been merged into tetex-base.  Below is the dpkg output.
 > --
 > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/cstexfonts_0.6.0_all.deb (--unpack):
 >  trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/public/cs/csaccent.mf', which is also in package tetex-base
 >  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 >  dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
 >  texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... 
 >  texhash: Done.
 >  Unpacking csplain (from .../archives/csplain_1.2.1_all.deb) ...
 >  dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/csplain_1.2.1_all.deb (--unpack): 
 >  trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/tex/csplain/csfonts.tex', which is also in package tetex-base
 >  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 >  Selecting previously deselected package cslatex.
 >  Unpacking cslatex (from .../archives/cslatex_1.2.1_all.deb) ...
 >  Unpacking cspsfonts (from .../cspsfonts_0.2.1_all.deb) ...
 >  dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/cspsfonts_0.2.1_all.deb (--unpack):
 >   trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/tex/csplain/cavantga.tex', which is also in package tetex-base
 >   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^



Reply to: