Bug#97648: marked as done (Setup fails since removal of tetex-nonfree with modified language.dat)
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 14:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105281405190.25170-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2001 07:37:38 +0000
>From bastiaan@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no Wed May 16 02:37:38 2001
Return-path: <bastiaan@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no>
Received: from mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no [129.241.62.215]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14zvsH-0001l4-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 02:37:37 -0500
Received: by mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no
via sendmail from stdin
id <m14zvsF-000SloC@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no> (Debian Smail3.2.0.111)
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 16 May 2001 09:37:35 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <m14zvsF-000SloC@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no>
From: Bastiaan Niels Veelo <bastiaan@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Setup fails since removal of tetex-nonfree with modified language.dat
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:37:34 +0200
Bcc:
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20001218-3
Severity: important
The problem:
Upgrading tetex halts with this message:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Setting up tetex-bin (1.0.7+20001218-3) ...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/spool/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
Error: `tex -ini -fmt=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' failed
Error: `etex -ini -efmt=elatex -progname=elatex *elatex.ini' failed
Error: `pdftex -ini -fmt=pdftex -progname=pdftex pdftex.ini' failed
Error: `pdftex -ini -fmt=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex pdflatex.ini' failed
Error: `pdfetex -ini -efmt=pdfelatex -progname=pdfelatex *pdfelatex.ini' failed
Error: `omega -ini -fmt=omega -progname=omega omega.ini' failed
Error: `omega -ini -fmt=lambda -progname=lambda lambda.ini' failed
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt successfully generated.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/etex.efmt successfully generated.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.efmt successfully generated.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/tex.fmt successfully generated.
###############################################################################
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
/usr/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
###############################################################################
This is a summary of all `failed' messages:
`tex -ini -fmt=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' failed
`etex -ini -efmt=elatex -progname=elatex *elatex.ini' failed
`pdftex -ini -fmt=pdftex -progname=pdftex pdftex.ini' failed
`pdftex -ini -fmt=pdflatex -progname=pdflatex pdflatex.ini' failed
`pdfetex -ini -efmt=pdfelatex -progname=pdfelatex *pdfelatex.ini' failed
`omega -ini -fmt=omega -progname=omega omega.ini' failed
`omega -ini -fmt=lambda -progname=lambda lambda.ini' failed
Output of initex is in /tmp/texiqMXFQ
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The cause:
The .log files mention complain about a missing nehyph2.tex, which was in tetex-nonfree previously. /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat is still configured for using that file.
Perhaps tetex-nonfree should not have allowed removal of itself before checking that that would not brake things, such as updating the rest of tetex?
Changing "dutch" to using "nehyph.tex" through "/usr/bin/texconfig hyphen latex"fixes the problem.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mimm215 2.2.17 #1 Sat Sep 9 12:42:22 EST 2000 i686
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debianutils 1.15 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg 1.8.3.1 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-19 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.2.3-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libkpathsea3 1.0.7+20001218-3 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii libpng2 1.0.11-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.010424 The GNU stdc++ library
ii libtiff3g 3.5.5-3 Tag Image File Format library
ii libwww0 5.3.2-2 The W3C-WWW library.
ii libxaw7 4.0.3-3 X Athena widget set library
ii perl-base [perl5-base] 5.6.0-21 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804-7 basic teTeX library files
ii xlibs 4.0.3-3 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.3-15 compression library - runtime
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 97648-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2001 12:06:24 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Mon May 28 07:06:24 2001
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.176.79]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 154Lmy-0002uS-00; Mon, 28 May 2001 07:06:24 -0500
Received: (qmail 11078 invoked from network); 28 May 2001 12:06:22 -0000
Received: from neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (bunk@129.187.176.23)
by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 28 May 2001 12:06:22 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 14:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-X-Sender: <bunk@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
To: <97648-done@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Closing this bug
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105281405190.25170-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 97648-done@bugs.debian.org
This bug is caused by a conffile that is not merged. When the user refuses
to get a new conffile he's responsible for updating the old one.
cu
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
Reply to: