Bug#81758: marked as done (tetex-base: conflicting files between tetex-base and csplain, cspsfonts, cstexfonts)
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 07:40:43 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105260734330.13960-100000@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
and subject line tetex-base in unstable does already conflict with these packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2001 04:31:45 +0000
>From c.ruffin@ieee.org Tue Jan 09 22:31:45 2001
Return-path: <c.ruffin@ieee.org>
Received: from duval.se.mediaone.net [24.129.0.67]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14GCvI-0006bB-00; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:31:45 -0600
Received: from surge (planw-65-33-233-143.pompano.net [65.33.233.143])
by duval.se.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA27309;
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:31:39 -0500 (EST)
From: c.ruffin@ieee.org
Received: from ruff by surge with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian))
id 14GCvH-0006lo-00; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 23:31:43 -0500
Subject: tetex-base: conflicting files between tetex-base and csplain, cspsfonts, cstexfonts
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
Message-Id: <E14GCvH-0006lo-00@surge>
Sender: Chris Ruffin <ruff@mediaone.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 23:31:43 -0500
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-4
Severity: important
While installing boot-floppies, which require csplain, cstexfonts, and
cspsfonts, I encountered numerous errors from these packages complaining
that tetex-base also includes several files. As a result, I can't install
csplain, cstexfonts, cspsfonts, or boot-floppies. I'm not sure what the
problem is here, other than perhaps csplain/cstexfonts/cspsfonts have
been merged into tetex-base. Below is the dpkg output.
--
Chris Ruffin <cmruffin@debian.org>
$ apt-get install boot-floppies
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
cslatex csplain cspsfonts cstexfonts libkpathsea3 tetex-base tetex-bin
tetex-extra
The following NEW packages will be installed:
boot-floppies cslatex csplain cspsfonts cstexfonts libkpathsea3 tetex-base
tetex-bin tetex-extra
0 packages upgraded, 9 newly installed, 0 to remove and 331 not upgraded.
Need to get 5856kB/29.0MB of archives. After unpacking 86.5MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main tetex-bin 1.0.7+20000807-7 [2872kB]
Get:2 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main libkpathsea3 1.0.7+20000807-7 [33.8kB]
Get:3 http://http.us.debian.org stable/main boot-floppies 2.2.17 [2920kB]
Get:4 http://http.us.debian.org stable/main cslatex 1.2.1 [29.0kB]
Fetched 3856kB in 23s (166kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-base.
(Reading database ... 91229 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-base (from .../tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-4_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libkpathsea3.
Unpacking libkpathsea3 (from .../libkpathsea3_1.0.7+20000807-7_i386.deb) ...
electing previously deselected package tetex-bin.
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_1.0.7+20000807-7_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-extra.
Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804-4_all.deb) ...
Unpacking cstexfonts (from .../cstexfonts_0.6.0_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/cstexfonts_0.6.0_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/public/cs/csaccent.mf', which is also in package tetex-base
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Unpacking csplain (from .../archives/csplain_1.2.1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/csplain_1.2.1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/tex/csplain/csfonts.tex', which is also in package tetex-base
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Selecting previously deselected package cslatex.
Unpacking cslatex (from .../archives/cslatex_1.2.1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking cspsfonts (from .../cspsfonts_0.2.1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/cspsfonts_0.2.1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/tex/csplain/cavantga.tex', which is also in package tetex-base
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Selecting previously deselected package boot-floppies.
Unpacking boot-floppies (from .../boot-floppies_2.2.17_all.deb) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/cstexfonts_0.6.0_all.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/csplain_1.2.1_all.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/cspsfonts_0.2.1_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux surge 2.4.0 #3 Sun Jan 7 04:12:55 EST 2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages tetex-base depends on:
ii dpkg 1.7.2 Package maintenance system for Debian
ii texinfo 4.0-5 Documentation system for on-line information
ii perl-5.005-bas 5.005.03-7.1 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5-base)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 81758-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2001 05:41:08 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Sat May 26 00:41:08 2001
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 153Wp2-0000SD-00; Sat, 26 May 2001 00:41:08 -0500
Received: (qmail 2523 invoked from network); 26 May 2001 05:41:07 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 26 May 2001 05:41:07 -0000
Received: from bunk (helo=localhost)
by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 153Woh-0003fI-00; Sat, 26 May 2001 07:40:47 +0200
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 07:40:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-X-Sender: <bunk@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
To: <78136-done@bugs.debian.org>, <81758-done@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base in unstable does already conflict with these packages
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105260734330.13960-100000@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 81758-done@bugs.debian.org
tetex-base in unstable does already conflict with csplain, cslatex and
cstexfonts.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
Reply to: