[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#82227: marked as done (tetex-extra pre-depends on orphaned package dpkg-perl)



Your message dated Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:11:16 -0500
with message-id <E14UaAu-0003ZG-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#82227: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2001 23:21:15 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sat Jan 13 17:21:15 2001
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14HZz0-0001MU-00; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:21:14 -0600
Received: from fisch.cyrius.com (IDENT:root@web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194])
	by web1.lanscape.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16985
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:21:12 -0600
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D999C23208; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:21:22 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:21:22 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-extra pre-depends on orphaned package dpkg-perl
Message-ID: <20010113232122.A13394@sumpf.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-4

tetex-extra has a
  Pre-Depends: dpkg-perl

However, dpkg-perl (dpkg-scriptlib) has been orphaned for over
160 days.  There is no one currently maintaining this package,
and according to some dpkg experts this package should be
removed from Debian as soon as possible.

Please, can you drop the Pre-Depends on this package so dpkg-perl
can be removed.  I don't know how much effort it will be to drop
this dependency, but it's necessary.

Thanks.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 82227-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2001 20:15:38 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sun Feb 18 14:15:38 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [::ffff:206.246.226.45] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14UaF7-0004tx-00; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:15:37 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14UaAu-0003ZG-00; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:11:16 -0500
From: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
To: 82227-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#82227: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804-5
Message-Id: <E14UaAu-0003ZG-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:11:16 -0500
Delivered-To: 82227-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5.diff.gz
tetex-nonfree_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
  to pool/non-free/t/tetex-base/tetex-nonfree_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5.dsc
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 82227@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:50:26 +0100
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-doc tetex-base tetex-extra tetex-nonfree
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Description: 
 tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
 tetex-doc  - teTeX documentation
 tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
 tetex-nonfree - upgrade convenience package (can be removed)
Closes: 82227 83711
Changes: 
 tetex-base (1.0.2+20000804-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * remove Predepends: dpkg-perl (closes: #82227)
   * conflicts now with csplain, cslatex and cstexfonts (closes: #83711)
Files: 
 51752f8a5b8ccfe284d9fbd14c48e63d 908 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5.dsc
 de08fed04a2370d11ca1f6ffac4a2f41 25639 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5.diff.gz
 539752d40e8962cf2f343e9521dfe164 13178772 tex standard tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
 9433ccaf776ae74b582cd01fcb2a2419 9721542 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
 3ee8dd883145e827136e5b8b6cc7e8ac 12374982 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb
 eb6be8f9b87db970356724da05cc18ea 2674 non-free/tex optional tetex-nonfree_1.0.2+20000804-5_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBOo7ZDW4/9k35XC9tAQFjwAf/QJJ3q1oC/9jwypJ6m2IPh7OTJaCdyWSm
ZJW4cMS6dn44DZ/fxKSEV0RHsuct2gBhMZmedF11tCFzLolcrnN6h2xoc9RcTket
d16xGqkQ76ojDnTe9/k2+c8je/VcKsglgpQjaSMoyYNx12Yn1yIK/ITRSAQIkhPp
2JlHX0jt8Vap1EEZVdROxnmUQ9b1afIH+NzgKMsYLNlRzx2h8ONbYx3U8tOlUUu9
Lq6bMtgORaGqV35AwSa+G9QqWNA8N6O58WRbRNZqPE08EPSpfnQkXNtgJk45ry6S
Z8I82Q84OliheA7j/G+Ti1Nd1At8E8qRbJ044lfosrDBlnrf/QMsWA==
=ssV9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: