Bug#65837: marked as done (installing local .mf files)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:06:48 +0200
with message-id <200009210706.JAA28003@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
and subject line Fixed in Version 1.0.7+20000807-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2000 15:29:04 +0000
>From jdc@jhu.edu Sun Jun 18 10:29:04 2000
Return-path: <jdc@jhu.edu>
Received: from jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu) [128.220.2.86]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 133h0R-00060K-00; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 10:29:04 -0500
Received: from conversion.jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu
(PMDF V5.2-31 #40996) id <01JQQW7TG9KWG745MT@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for
submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 11:29:08 EDT
Received: from scratchy (chow.mat.jhu.edu [128.220.25.2])
by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.2-31 #40996)
with ESMTP id <01JQQW7QUC8KG5V09M@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for
submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 11:29:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from jdc by scratchy with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 133h0G-0004En-00; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:28:52 +0200
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:28:52 +0200
From: Dan Christensen <jdc@jhu.edu>
Subject: installing local .mf files
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Message-id: <E133h0G-0004En-00@scratchy>
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.56
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.56
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.6-7
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if the default configuration of tetex allowed you to
just plop some .mf files into a directory in /usr/local and then have
the pk files created as needed and added to the system font directories.
Could the set-up be altered to make this possible? (Or is it already?)
[I don't want to add them to the /usr/share/texmf tree as I want to
keep all local additions separate.]
Also, is it intentional that when a user puts .mf files somewhere
in his home directory, and alters MFINPUTS accordingly, the pk files
that get created when xdvi is run are left in the same directory as
the dvi file, instead of being added to the system directories?
Dan
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux scratchy 2.2.13 #1 Sun Mar 5 13:09:42 EST 2000 i686
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debianutils 1.13.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg-perl 0.1-3.1 Perl interface modules for dpkg
ii ed 0.2-18 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.1.3-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpng2 1.0.5-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libstdc++2.10 1:2.95.2-12 The GNU stdc++ library
ii tetex-base 1.0-10 basic teTeX library files
ii tetex-lib 1.0.6-7 shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii xlib6g 3.3.6-7 shared libraries required by X cli
ii zlib1g [libz1] 1:1.1.3-5 compression library - runtime
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/texmf/texmf.cnf changed [not included]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 65837-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2000 07:06:51 +0000
>From martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de Thu Sep 21 02:06:51 2000
Return-path: <martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
Received: from lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [::ffff:134.93.144.162]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13c0RW-0000eA-00; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 02:06:50 -0500
Received: from harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (root@harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.19])
by lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id JAA08294
for <65837-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:06:49 +0200
Received: from bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (root@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.18])
by harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id JAA04267
for <65837-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:06:49 +0200
From: Christoph Martin <martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
Received: (from martin@localhost)
by bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id JAA28003
for 65837-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:06:48 +0200
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:06:48 +0200
Message-Id: <200009210706.JAA28003@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
To: 65837-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in Version 1.0.7+20000807-2
Delivered-To: 65837-done@bugs.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:24:40 +0200
Source: tetex-bin
Binary: tetex-dev tetex-lib tetex-bin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.7+20000807-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Description:
tetex-bin - teTeX binary files
tetex-dev - kpathsea.a and include files for teTeX
tetex-lib - shared libkpathsea for teTeX
Closes: 65837 66743 69603 69779 71966
Changes:
tetex-bin (1.0.7+20000807-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* fixing Build-Depends (closes: #69603, #71966)
* added postscript-viewer and pdf-viewer to Suggests
* reintroduce configuration for local files (closes: #65837, #69779)
* conflicts with old nextaw(g) versions (closes: #66743)
Files:
ccfbf6cf4395dab5b7c4a22e9772fa00 982 tex standard tetex-bin_1.0.7+20000807-2.dsc
6d1481066b9a69fb1c9a966b559c1c6b 19901 tex standard tetex-bin_1.0.7+20000807-2.diff.gz
968dd50098df81a52f09ea7f7039d518 2871438 tex standard tetex-bin_1.0.7+20000807-2_i386.deb
fdb0bca64a8f4225f0cec2382ccc8a50 33384 tex standard tetex-lib_1.0.7+20000807-2_i386.deb
6de48c152f547da275e88f102a95e5fa 64052 tex optional tetex-dev_1.0.7+20000807-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBOce35G4/9k35XC9tAQFdUAgAw0UlzmPmfwr68XzEwCe7K7XLzDBQtqa8
U2zygxrBrI6j+Wj44ZhuIwYaHeUi1IQX1cevWKd1R2MZTNnRaCbhNAKrMw9ob/91
Cci3X4o83Vvz+ZMP+Whp7Hcm2VEpKHqMEaoHd5WkSed/dgr/YybdVoHR0kbMOVxV
2TuiU+dIbhpe0EAqKi7MZAKH1aic+s1o3UQgRhvRZc3ekC+v+xkBU17fV3zbLWib
fWLbAP+O1RUAKIED6tRgR22kfx49vcYoFmi2LXbUctTOL8iUbm1Lp3Yl/ug+9ji1
6TU0vKf3Qe4yNIvKmNvLFnBIWAFlo+CSnTnPia/ZhOwJMwNtexoYIg==
=8+PK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: