Bug#61272: marked as done (task-tex: should depend on virtual package gv not gv itself)
Your message dated Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:52:06 +0200
with message-id <200010011152.NAA05304@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
and subject line Fixed in Version 0.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2000 18:56:39 +0000
Received: (qmail 31218 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2000 18:56:31 -0000
Received: from newmail.spectraweb.ch (194.158.230.44)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2000 18:56:31 -0000
Received: from LocalHost (194.230.218.111) by newmail.spectraweb.ch; 28 Mar 2000 20:56:30 +0200
Received: from tpo by localhost with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 12a12w-0001U4-00; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:48:58 +0200
From: tpo@spin.ch
Subject: task-tex: should depend on virtual package gv not gv itself
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Message-Id: <E12a12w-0001U4-00@localhost>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:48:58 +0200
Package: task-tex
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
task-tex says it depends on gv, but I guess it should only recommend
it? But even if, gnome-gv f.ex. also provides gv, so I'd suggest to make
task-tex -recommend- a virtual package gv and not gv itself...
Anyway:
Thanks :-) I -do- appreciate your work :-))!
*t
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux localhost 2.2.14 #3 SMP Wed Mar 15 17:26:04 CET 2000 i586 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 61272-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2000 11:52:09 +0000
>From martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de Sun Oct 01 06:52:09 2000
Return-path: <martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
Received: from lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [::ffff:134.93.144.162]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13fhf6-0003qs-00; Sun, 01 Oct 2000 06:52:08 -0500
Received: from harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (root@harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.19])
by lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id NAA05362
for <61272-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:52:06 +0200
Received: from bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (root@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.18])
by harriet.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id NAA26333
for <61272-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:52:06 +0200
From: Christoph Martin <martin@verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
Received: (from martin@localhost)
by bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id NAA05304
for 61272-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:52:06 +0200
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:52:06 +0200
Message-Id: <200010011152.NAA05304@bastel.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de>
To: 61272-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in Version 0.3
Delivered-To: 61272-done@bugs.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 19:43:54 +0200
Source: task-tex
Binary: task-tex
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Martin <christoph.martin@uni-mainz.de>
Description:
task-tex - TeX/LaTeX environment
Closes: 48215 61272
Changes:
task-tex (0.3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* recommends postscript-viewer instead of depends gv (closes: #61272)
* recommends hyperlatex instead of depends, to not indirectly depend on
emacsen (closes: #48215)
Files:
558435664dfa8b9706c10bc6fb4a76c8 754 tex optional task-tex_0.3.dsc
7e8b3c8141f42e0f0bac83cc9ead969b 2033 tex optional task-tex_0.3.tar.gz
a73d9255d2a93fa4aeb521fc28fb500b 2368 tex optional task-tex_0.3_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBOdYsOW4/9k35XC9tAQEzOgf+P8lF3CTfL2XTDi4nxHKxbl7kCvXqW/Bl
c4oHfHVPBwJ7f1VmKO3rrA6w09RzqokhwJcFYNxsEplDr44RywuEN+rAXujGRgvV
KBSWJUbzYy8POLd0OtOxCN+ci2CQjLrkhpCHfAiSpJzXa7rEAQnR+4Ztf84Rt9kx
qcXC6msePqJfNhbHGn9rJ/Ye++b51qZX7karMK7n/t0/xaMJMP+nyRQytJhNXc3R
j7ltS7KY6dIbxIoxb6yikWogyBaXXOf1tDG6sHlIl76XbZU6Smp0olhlQX/0/xI5
L5+3XLDTcFpY0G7IXyr4o+e2Mr2M/lyKt+Vn9WYM4jdT3aclS2koCQ==
=6UqM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: