> didn't show the problem, either. I'm stumped. I think we need
> more information about Martin's setup. (Or for Martin to make
> sure he's running the same version of the packages the rest of us
> have.)
I'm sorry, as I wrote in last email, now I have new ...tex... packages and
I can not reproduce the bug for now. Just:
probably in may (may be april - but no sooner, may be june - but no later)
I have upgraded ...tex... packages - into frozen from stable (I think).
It was in time, when they were moving from /usr/lib into /usr/share and
when there was a bug with non-clean purging of something somewhere in /var
directory (during tetex install). I think that it is all.
now, after purging of cs...tex... and then upgrading of tetex..., it is
ok. it stay ok after new install of cs...tex... packages too. but in the
time of the punctation bug presenting in my comp, just dpkg -i of all the
packages of ...tex... (including cs... ones) was not able to eliminate the
bug; regardless of kind of installed packages (frozen/unstable).
I just know (as I wrote) that the only bug statement was
"\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}". with usage of it, the points were missing,
without the statement (or with commenting "%%\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}"),
it was ok, i.e. with the starting points in dvi/ps files.
as I see in the bad postscript file, it looks that the points are there,
they seem just to have strange coordinates. and as I see now, I have got
some log files (from the bad trials). I think, there are pieces of
information on the tex setup. and I think, I sent it in a attachment, but
I am sending it again. test2 and test3 are bad, test31 is good. it is in
"tex3.tgz" file.
Attachment:
tex3.tgz
Description: Binary data