Re: Bug#50370 acknowledged by developer (tetex-bin: dvips cannot work with cmcti12.pfb font)

[Serge Gavrilov <serge@SG3816.spb.edu>]

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 03:03:20AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Atsuhito Kohda writes:
>  > Hi, tetex-maintainer.
>  > 
>  > On my potato system, the situation is as follows;
>  > 
>  > nsx:~/temp$ locate cmcti12
>  > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/public/cmcyr/cmcti12.tfm
>  > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcti12.pfb
>  > 
>  > nsx:/usr/share/texmf/dvips$ grep -r cmcti12 *
>  > config/cmcyr.map:cmcti12 cmcti12 <cmcti12.pfb
>  > config/pdftex.map:cmcti12 <cmcti12.pfb
>  > 
>  > Yes, there is certainly cmcti12.pfb and cmcyr.map for cmcti12.pfb
>  > so it is sufficient to add
>  > 
>  > p +cmcyr.map
>  > 
>  > to config.ps, and really this worked well for me.
>  > 
>  > I do not know what is the situation of slink system but
>  > I think this is not a bug at all.
>  > 
> 
> You are right. User configuration problem. Closing.
> 
> Christoph

Hi!

I am very sorry! Do you read the bugreport? 

--- Begin /etc/texmf/dvips/psfonts.map
.
.
.
cmcti10 cmcti10 <cmcti10.pfb
cmcti12 cmcti12 <cmcti12.pfb
cmcti7 cmcti7 <cmcti7.pfb
cmcti8 cmcti8 <cmcti8.pfb
cmcti9 cmcti9 <cmcti9.pfb

I divert dvips from Slink ONLY. All config files are from potato.
I need to explain the situation once more. 

"dvips.debian" is dvips from potato
"dvips" is dvips from slink
ALL CONFIG FILES ARE THE SAME.

$ dvips.debian Project.dvi 
This is dvips(k) 5.86 Copyright 1999 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2000.03.05:2206' -> Project.ps
<texc.pro><texps.pro><special.pro>. <cmcbx12.pfb><cmbx12.pfb><cmcti12.pfb> First number not found 
 ERROR in encoding vector in <cmcti12.pfb

$ dvips Project.dvi 
This is dvips(k) 5.82 Copyright 1998 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2000.03.05:2206' -> Project.ps
<texc.pro><texps.pro><special.pro>. <cmcbx12.pfb><cmbx12.pfb><cmcti12.pfb>
<cmti12.pfb><cmmi10.pfb><cmex10.pfb><cmcsl12.pfb><cmsl12.pfb><cmr10.pfb>
<cmsy10.pfb><cmmi12.pfb><cmcyr12.pfb><cmr12.pfb><cmcyr17.pfb>[1] [1] [2] [3] 
[4] [5] [6] [7<Practica21.eps>] [8] [9<Practica22.eps>] [10] [11
<Practica23.eps>] [12] [13] [14] [15<Practica24.eps>] [16] [17] [18] [19] 
[20] [21] [22<Practica31.eps>] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27<Practica41.eps>] [28] 
[29] [30<Graphic2.eps>] [31<Practica51.eps>] [32]

It seems for me, that this is bug.

Thanks.

-- 
Serge Gavrilov