Your message dated Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:55:37 +0100 with message-id <43b04122-a47b-31d6-d220-2540e920dc6b@debian.org> and subject line upgrade report for EOL Debian release has caused the Debian Bug report #781966, regarding upgrade-reports: wheezy -> jessie to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 781966: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781966 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: upgrade-reports: wheezy -> jessie
- From: Reiner Herrmann <reiner@reiner-h.de>
- Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:28:18 +0200
- Message-id: <55217EC2.2030806@reiner-h.de>
Package: upgrade-reports Version: N/A Severity: minor My previous release is: wheezy I am upgrading to: jessie Archive date: 2015-04-04 Upgrade date: 2015-04-04, ~14:30 CEST uname -a before/after upgrade: Linux [redacted] 3.14.17 #1 SMP Sun Aug 17 12:03:04 CEST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux Method: replaced wheezy with jessie in sources.list; apt-get update && apt-get install sysvinit-core && apt-get dist-upgrade (I installed sysvinit-core to stay with sysv init) Contents of /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://debian.n-ix.net/debian jessie main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free The upgraded system is a Xen-based vserver (guest), where the kernel is provided and can't be exchanged. This was also the reason for the only issue I had while upgrading: udev has a new udev.preinst script, which checks the installed kernel versions. There was still an unused kernel package installed from an old squeeze installation (linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64), but the running kernel has actually been 3.14.17 for a long time. The preinst script didn't detect a recent enough kernel and failed, which was a little scary at first (as it is a vserver I didn't want to reboot until I was sure about the situation). But after I had a look at the script, I assumed that the currently running kernel has to be recent enough and that the running kernel version just wasn't taken into account. After forcing the installation as told (touch /etc/udev/kernel-upgrade), the upgrade was successful and it booted without problems. Another minor problem I noticed after the upgrade was that some vhosts of apache2 weren't running as expected. But after a look into apache2/NEWS.Debian.gz those problems were easy to resolve. In summary I think the upgrade went quite smooth. :-)Attachment: upgrade-report.tar.xz
Description: application/xzAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 783177-done@bugs.debian.org, 788295-done@bugs.debian.org, 792803-done@bugs.debian.org, 793175-done@bugs.debian.org, 862866-done@bugs.debian.org, 865657-done@bugs.debian.org, 869849-done@bugs.debian.org, 871308-done@bugs.debian.org, 875498-done@bugs.debian.org, 877307-done@bugs.debian.org, 891926-done@bugs.debian.org, 923790-done@bugs.debian.org, 925598-done@bugs.debian.org, 619521-done@bugs.debian.org, 719003-done@bugs.debian.org, 759674-done@bugs.debian.org, 787525-done@bugs.debian.org, 585737-done@bugs.debian.org, 752050-done@bugs.debian.org, 772661-done@bugs.debian.org, 781966-done@bugs.debian.org, 818510-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: upgrade report for EOL Debian release
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:55:37 +0100
- Message-id: <43b04122-a47b-31d6-d220-2540e920dc6b@debian.org>
Dear reporter, Thanks for taking the time long ago to submit your upgrade report. I'm closing these reports now because the Debian releases they were reported against have reached their end-of-life (some long ago). Unfortunately it's possible that the report I'm now closing may still have relevant information for the current release (bullseye). If you believe that's the case, don't hesitate to reopen the bug, retitle it and provide further information and it will be seen during the current freeze period of Debian. PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---