[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#783907: marked as done (upgrade-reports: "apt-get upgrade" ends up in an dist-upgrade from wheezy to, jessie)

Your message dated Fri, 1 May 2015 09:41:45 +0200
with message-id <20150501074145.GP29560@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#783907: upgrade-reports: "apt-get upgrade" ends up in an dist-upgrade from wheezy to, jessie
has caused the Debian Bug report #783907,
regarding upgrade-reports: "apt-get upgrade" ends up in an dist-upgrade from wheezy to, jessie
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
783907: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks the whole system

Dear Maintainer,
sorry - forgot to add the sources.list file in the first bug-report. Here are the entries of the sources.list file: 


deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free

deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free

deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free

deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main
Maybe the "whezzy-backports" entry at the end of the list caused the problem? 


   * What led up to the situation?

Try to update a wheezy system (7.8).

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

I made a "apt-get update" and then "apt-get upgrade"
Programm asked to download about 250 MB of data and to proceed.
Confirmed with "Y"

   * What was the outcome of this action?
Download was proceeded and but instead of "apt-get upgrade" "apt-get dist-upgrade" 
was done. System was jessie (8) after ending.
System was bootable and a bunch of packages where not updated.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

I expected a normal upgrade of wheezy.

In /etc/apt/sources.list all entries are still for "wheezy".

I marked this bug-report "critical" because if there is something
serios about wheezy/jessie-repos it maybe affect many people by
dist-upgrading unexpecely.

If this can not be confirmed please downgrade this report to normal.

Regards,
Werner


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.8
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--
WS

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:37:22AM +0200, Werner Scharinger wrote:
> >deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
                                       ^^^^^^
> >
> >deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
> >
> >deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
> >
> >deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main
> 
> Maybe the "whezzy-backports" entry at the end of the list caused the
> problem?

No.
 
> In /etc/apt/sources.list all entries are still for "wheezy".

As we see no.

apt of course seses jessie now if you have "stable" there
Closing

> I marked this bug-report "critical" because if there is something
> serios about wheezy/jessie-repos it maybe affect many people by
> dist-upgrading unexpecely.

Except the usual stable link, no.

Closing.

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---
Reply to: