Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:08:20 +0200 with message-id <20101010110820.GA16553@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#503303: Bug#503712: etch->lenny upgrade left the system in broken state has caused the Debian Bug report #503303, regarding etch -> lenny minimal chrrot upgrade fails due to Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 503303: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503303 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: etch -> lenny minimal chrrot upgrade fails due to Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop
- From: Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:40:38 +0200
- Message-id: <20081024144038.GA10245@yellowpig>
Package: upgrade-reports Severity: serious Upgrading a clean minimal etch chroot to lenny fails with E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential package tzdata due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This is often bad, but if you really want to do it, activate the APT::Force-LoopBreak option. E: Internal Error, Could not early remove tzdata This is reproducible with piuparts. This is on i386. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballombe@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 503303-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#503303: Bug#503712: etch->lenny upgrade left the system in broken state
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:08:20 +0200
- Message-id: <20101010110820.GA16553@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
- In-reply-to: <200810272142.25231.holger@layer-acht.org>
- References: <49060995.50708@gmail.com> <200810272142.25231.holger@layer-acht.org>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 22:42:24 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm pretty sure this bug is a duplicate of 503303, which look like duplicates > of #464559 (merged with #466027, #466695, #467059, #475530). > > "Unfortunatly" those bugs are closed in sid/lenny, but thats exactly the > problem here (as we cannot upgrade apt in an etch pointrelease as upgrades > need to work whithout applying all pointreleases), which then leads to the > solution: apt has to be upgraded to lenny before the rest and this needs to > be documented in the release-notes. > > So, forcemerge and reassign?! > Etch->lenny upgrade bug, probably not going to be fixed now if it hasn't been before, so closing. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---