[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#316379: marked as done (release notes inconsistent: woody vs. sarge aptitude)



Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:04 -0400
with message-id <4330B904.50703@dlgeek.net>
and subject line Closing old bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2005 14:24:36 +0000
>From justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net Thu Jun 30 07:24:36 2005
Return-path: <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Dnzy0-00041u-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 07:24:36 -0700
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66] (may be forged))
	by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5UEOXDX009418
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:24:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Dnzxu-00036V-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:24:30 -0400
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:24:30 -0400
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: release notes inconsistent: woody vs. sarge aptitude
Message-ID: <20050630142430.GC11707@andromeda>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: important

http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2005/06/msg00355.html

I haven't gotten a response in two days, and the bug still applies, so
I'm reporting it officially now..

 | The release notes presently read:
 | 
 | A.2 Installing woody version of aptitude
 | First you need to make sure you will install woody's version of
 | aptitude and not sarge's by following the instructions in Checking
 | your sources list, Section A.3. 
 | 
 | which is inconsistent with:
 | 
 | .5.2 Upgrading aptitude
 | Upgrade tests have shown that sarge's version of aptitude is better at
 | solving the complex dependencies during an upgrade than either apt-get
 | or woody's aptitude. It should therefore be upgraded first using: 
 | 
 |      # aptitude install aptitude
 | 
 | This should be changed, no?

Justin

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316379-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 01:36:15 +0000
>From astronut@dlgeek.net Tue Sep 20 18:36:15 2005
Return-path: <astronut@dlgeek.net>
Received: from sfnc-162-39-87-185.netdialus.com (mail.dlgeek.net) [162.39.87.185] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EHtWw-0000Dt-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:36:14 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (debian [192.168.0.6])
	by mail.dlgeek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE5D28269;
	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4330B904.50703@dlgeek.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:04 -0400
From: Benjamin Seidenberg <astronut@dlgeek.net>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 309146-done@bugs.debian.org, 295213-done@bugs.debian.org,
	310005-done@bugs.debian.org, 316379-done@bugs.debian.org,
	316948-done@bugs.debian.org, 309329-done@bugs.debian.org,
	309548-done@bugs.debian.org, 310124-done@bugs.debian.org,
	310793-done@bugs.debian.org, 310818-done@bugs.debian.org,
	316991-done@bugs.debian.org, 318372-done@bugs.debian.org,
	165604-done@bugs.debian.org, 273299-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing old bugs
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22"
Delivered-To: 316379-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 11

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This bug report refers to problems upgrading from a stable woody system 
to an almost complete sarge, while Sarge was still testing or in some 
cases, an even earlier transition. Since sarge has been released for 
several months now, I think this report no longer applies, and am 
closing it. Many of these issues were fixed, the rest most likely do not 
matter. If you feel this bug was closed prematurely, please reopen the bug.

Thank You,
Benjamin Seidenberg

--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDMLkJev9LOsNKpIQRApMpAJ9FvJKt83hwlJq+gWEVHF8SwjaI0QCfWED0
ZEdFVBXIlcko8x/tGeyDzpQ=
=2n6i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22--



Reply to: