Bug#318372: marked as done (upgrade-reports: Duplicate entries in ps2pk.map during upgrade woody to sarge)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:04 -0400
with message-id <4330B904.50703@dlgeek.net>
and subject line Closing old bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2005 06:02:16 +0000
>From vmunoz@macul.ciencias.uchile.cl Thu Jul 14 23:02:16 2005
Return-path: <vmunoz@macul.ciencias.uchile.cl>
Received: from spl09.esst.kyushu-u.ac.jp [133.5.188.177] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DtJH6-0000ZN-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:02:16 -0700
Received: from vmunoz by spl09.esst.kyushu-u.ac.jp with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DtJH3-0000ZL-Ol
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:02:13 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Victor Munoz <vmunoz@macul.ciencias.uchile.cl>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: upgrade-reports: Duplicate entries in ps2pk.map during upgrade woody to sarge
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:02:13 +0900
Message-Id: <E1DtJH3-0000ZL-Ol@spl09.esst.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal
In a way, this is a duplicate of bug 306051, but I believe my problem is
caused specifically by the upgrade process, so I'm filing a bug against
upgrade-reports instead of reopening the bug.
After upgrading from woody to sarge, xdvi began complaining every time:
xdvi: Warning: /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/ps2pk.map: entry for font "cmex7"
on line 93 overrides previous entry.
xdvi: Warning: /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/ps2pk.map: entry for font "cmex8"
on line 95 overrides previous entry.
xdvi: Warning: /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/ps2pk.map: entry for font
"cmex9" on line 97 overrides previous entry.
Bug 306051, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306051,
describes the same behaviour after adding a new file to /etc/texmf/updmap.d.
The original author solved the problem by running udpmap again, but it
didn't work for me. The reason, I think, is that after the upgrade there are
two versions of bsr-interpolated.map:
$ locate bsr-interpolated.map
/etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map
/usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/bsr-interpolated.map
I guess one was installed by woody, the other by sarge:
ls -l /etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/bsr-interpolated.map
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1833 1999-11-24 07:19 /etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2315 2002-12-25 23:14 /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/bsr-interpolated.map
I don't really understand the problem, because running updmap reports all
files included, but only one bsr-interpolated.map is reported:
#updmap
[...]
Scanning for MixedMap entries:
using map file /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/bsr-interpolated.map'
[...]
However, the end result is still a ps2pk.map file with duplicate entries
for cmex7, cmex8.
My solution was to delete /etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map, run
updmap again, and then I got a clean ps2pk.map. Now xdvi does not complain.
Regards,
Victor
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-bf2.4
Locale: LANG=es.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=es.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318372-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 01:36:15 +0000
>From astronut@dlgeek.net Tue Sep 20 18:36:15 2005
Return-path: <astronut@dlgeek.net>
Received: from sfnc-162-39-87-185.netdialus.com (mail.dlgeek.net) [162.39.87.185]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHtWw-0000Dt-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:36:14 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (debian [192.168.0.6])
by mail.dlgeek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE5D28269;
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4330B904.50703@dlgeek.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:04 -0400
From: Benjamin Seidenberg <astronut@dlgeek.net>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 309146-done@bugs.debian.org, 295213-done@bugs.debian.org,
310005-done@bugs.debian.org, 316379-done@bugs.debian.org,
316948-done@bugs.debian.org, 309329-done@bugs.debian.org,
309548-done@bugs.debian.org, 310124-done@bugs.debian.org,
310793-done@bugs.debian.org, 310818-done@bugs.debian.org,
316991-done@bugs.debian.org, 318372-done@bugs.debian.org,
165604-done@bugs.debian.org, 273299-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing old bugs
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22"
Delivered-To: 318372-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 14
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
This bug report refers to problems upgrading from a stable woody system
to an almost complete sarge, while Sarge was still testing or in some
cases, an even earlier transition. Since sarge has been released for
several months now, I think this report no longer applies, and am
closing it. Many of these issues were fixed, the rest most likely do not
matter. If you feel this bug was closed prematurely, please reopen the bug.
Thank You,
Benjamin Seidenberg
--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDMLkJev9LOsNKpIQRApMpAJ9FvJKt83hwlJq+gWEVHF8SwjaI0QCfWED0
ZEdFVBXIlcko8x/tGeyDzpQ=
=2n6i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22--
Reply to: