Bug#309329: marked as done (sarge upgrade)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:04 -0400
with message-id <4330B904.50703@dlgeek.net>
and subject line Closing old bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2005 13:15:15 +0000
>From marco.bertolini1@studenti.unipr.it Mon May 16 06:15:15 2005
Return-path: <marco.bertolini1@studenti.unipr.it>
Received: from as1.cineca.com [130.186.84.251]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXfRD-0003p5-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 06:15:15 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by as1.cineca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC3D6590F
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from unipr.mm.cineca.it (unipr.mm.cineca.it [130.186.10.204])
by as1.cineca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FE06590D
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from purplehaze (adsl-ull-67-7.41-151.net24.it [151.41.7.67])
as user marco.bertolini1@studenti.unipr.it by unipr.mm.cineca.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1164C314497
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 16 May 2005 15:15:09 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:57:31 +0200
From: Marco Bertolini - Sal <marco.bertolini1@studenti.unipr.it>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: sarge upgrade
Message-ID: <20050516145731.129eda4a@purplehaze>
Organization: Relug
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Cineca AppOs 0.85 at as1.cineca.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: upgrade-reports
Archive date: Sun May 15 19:00:02 UTC 2005
uname -a: Linux charas 2.4.29 #10 Sat Mar 26 15:40:33 CET 2005 i686
GNU/Linux
Method: apt-get -f dist-upgrade
Contents of /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ testing main
- Were there any non-Debian packages installed before the upgrade? If
so, what were they?
I used amule, amavisd-new, clamav, dovecot from the backports.org
archive.
I also used xbindkeys and xbindkeys-config from
deb http://b.berteau.free.fr/ stable main
Finally I installed mplayer from marillat repository
- Was the system pre-update a pure woody system? If not, which packages
were not from woody?
Apart from the previously described unofficial woody packages, the
sistem was a pure woody system.
- Did any packages fail to upgrade?
No packages failed to upgrade.
- Were there any problems with the system after upgrading?
Further Comments/Problems:
I had to manually uninstall libtime-hires-perl, libdigest-md5-perl
and libmime-base64-perl. Anyway the further was signaled to me
by deborphan.
I also had to upgrade fetchmail by itself, beacuse the system wasn't
able to remove fetchmail-common
Please attach the output of "COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l" (or "env COLUMNS ...",
depending on your shell) from before and after the upgrade so that we
know what packages were installed on your system.
Doh! I forgot to save the output before the upgrade. I hope that the
output after the upgrade will be useful
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309329-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 01:36:15 +0000
>From astronut@dlgeek.net Tue Sep 20 18:36:15 2005
Return-path: <astronut@dlgeek.net>
Received: from sfnc-162-39-87-185.netdialus.com (mail.dlgeek.net) [162.39.87.185]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHtWw-0000Dt-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:36:14 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (debian [192.168.0.6])
by mail.dlgeek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE5D28269;
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4330B904.50703@dlgeek.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:36:04 -0400
From: Benjamin Seidenberg <astronut@dlgeek.net>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 309146-done@bugs.debian.org, 295213-done@bugs.debian.org,
310005-done@bugs.debian.org, 316379-done@bugs.debian.org,
316948-done@bugs.debian.org, 309329-done@bugs.debian.org,
309548-done@bugs.debian.org, 310124-done@bugs.debian.org,
310793-done@bugs.debian.org, 310818-done@bugs.debian.org,
316991-done@bugs.debian.org, 318372-done@bugs.debian.org,
165604-done@bugs.debian.org, 273299-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing old bugs
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22"
Delivered-To: 309329-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
This bug report refers to problems upgrading from a stable woody system
to an almost complete sarge, while Sarge was still testing or in some
cases, an even earlier transition. Since sarge has been released for
several months now, I think this report no longer applies, and am
closing it. Many of these issues were fixed, the rest most likely do not
matter. If you feel this bug was closed prematurely, please reopen the bug.
Thank You,
Benjamin Seidenberg
--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDMLkJev9LOsNKpIQRApMpAJ9FvJKt83hwlJq+gWEVHF8SwjaI0QCfWED0
ZEdFVBXIlcko8x/tGeyDzpQ=
=2n6i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig77C896AA4B9307F5128CBC22--
Reply to: