On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 06:39:26PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 03:31:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 03:14:52PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > I believe the double-free bug is: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=326856 > > No, the double-free bug is a bug in libterm-readline-gnu-perl. That's > > why the title of bug #326492 (merged with 326856) is "Please conflict > > with libterm-readline-gnu-perl << 1.15-2). > > The fix for this is to either to install libterm-readline-gnu-perl from > > unstable, or to configure debconf to use a different front-end. > Okay. > Can you comment on the present state of several package being > uninstallable in testing? That's either a local misconfiguration (packages on hold), or packages on the user's system that didn't come from either sarge or etch. Britney enforces installability of all packages in testing except when the release team meddles, and we didn't. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature