[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#309560: marked as done ([Release-notes] s/Woody/Sarge typos.)



Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2005 03:33:21 -0500
with message-id <20050525083321.GA27066@master.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#309560: Release Notes typo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 00:34:24 +0000
>From ewen@basilica.la.naos.co.nz Tue May 17 17:34:24 2005
Return-path: <ewen@basilica.la.naos.co.nz>
Received: from synagogue.naos.co.nz [202.53.189.10] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DYCVv-0001Iq-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 17:34:19 -0700
Received: from basilica.la.naos.co.nz (home.naos.co.nz [203.79.72.36])
	by synagogue.naos.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FF43848E2F
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 18 May 2005 12:34:16 +1200 (NZST)
Received: from basilica.la.naos.co.nz (basilica.la.naos.co.nz [127.0.0.1])
	by basilica.la.naos.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898483D1FE57
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 18 May 2005 12:34:24 +1200 (NZST)
From: Ewen McNeill <ewen@naos.co.nz>
Subject: Release Notes typo
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <25840.1116376464.1@basilica.la.naos.co.nz>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 12:34:24 +1200
Sender: ewen@basilica.la.naos.co.nz
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20050518003424.898483D1FE57@basilica.la.naos.co.nz>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: upgrade-reports

Archive date: Tue May 17 20:00:01 UTC 2005
Upgrade date: 2005/05/18 12:30:00 +1200

Apologies for abusing this method to report a Sarge release documentation 
issue, but it seemed the most likely to get to the relevant people in 
a position to actually fix it before the release.

In the provisional release notes, eg:

http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/sparc/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html

there are references to "Woody" which look like they should be "Sarge", eg

-=- cut here -=-
2.1 What's new in the distribution?
[...]
To replace the aging, much-maligned, yet still popular dselect, many apt frontends have been in development during the woody release cycle. 
-=- cut here -=-

It might be worth someones time to search for "woody" in the release
notes and just double check that all the instances really should be
woody.  (The rest on that page seem fine.)

Ewen

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309560-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 08:33:29 +0000
>From ballombe@master.debian.org Wed May 25 01:33:29 2005
Return-path: <ballombe@master.debian.org>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DarKT-0005lK-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 01:33:29 -0700
Received: from ballombe by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DarKL-0008Rn-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:33:21 -0500
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 03:33:21 -0500
To: Ewen McNeill <ewen@naos.co.nz>, 309560-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#309560: Release Notes typo
Message-ID: <20050525083321.GA27066@master.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 20050518003424.898483D1FE57@basilica.la.naos.co.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050518003424.898483D1FE57@basilica.la.naos.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Bill Allombert <ballombe@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: 309560-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
	OUR_MTA_MSGID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:34:24PM +1200, Ewen McNeill wrote:
> Package: upgrade-reports
> 
> Apologies for abusing this method to report a Sarge release documentation 
> issue, but it seemed the most likely to get to the relevant people in 
> a position to actually fix it before the release.

No problem, since there is no pseudo-packages for the release notes.
Next time just use a title starting with [Release notes].

> In the provisional release notes, eg:
> 
> http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/sparc/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html
> 
> there are references to "Woody" which look like they should be "Sarge", eg
> 
> -=- cut here -=-
> 2.1 What's new in the distribution?
> [...]
> To replace the aging, much-maligned, yet still popular dselect, many apt frontends have been in development during the woody release cycle. 
> -=- cut here -=-

Frans Pop has changed this text to:
 
  The sarge version of aptitude is the preferred program for package
  management from console. It has proven to be better at dependency
  resolution than apt-get. aptitude supports most command line
  operations of apt-get. If you are still using dselect, you should also
  give aptitude a try as frontend for package management.

so I am closing this bug.

Thanks for your bug report!
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here.



Reply to: