Am 2005-02-12 05:35:06, schrieb Joao Clemente:
> Hum? What is 64MB? 102 packages is almost the same as the number I
> reported, but 64 MB is way off the 152 MB my woody occupies (and I
> installed in a ext3 partition also, dunno the block size)
My Servers have:
hda1 250 MB / Rescue system
hda2 250 MB swap
hda3 500 MB /tmp
hda5 500 MB /prod1 First productions system
hda6 250 MB /prod1/var/log
hda7 500 MB /prod2 Second productions system
hda8 250 MB /prod2/var/log
...
Now if I update to Sarge it does not moer fit on the Partitons
I have to reinstall 26 Servers...
> >With the base of Sarge I do nt know the Packages,
> >but there are 190 MByte.
>
> Once again, what is 190 MByte?
Baseinstall of SARGE without any additional Packages selected.
> And once again, I cannot understand your reasoning here.... I just said
> above that sarge takes 372 MB TOTAL, you say a 500 MByte partition is
> too small for your upgrade for sarge? I must be missing something here...
Install apache, php, courier-*, ssh and some other
required Server packages... and you know what I mean.
Some of the Packages are in SARGE tree to four times
bigger as in WOODY, - and I do not need it !!!
This ist, why I try to continue with WOODY.
You know: Don't touch a running System!
> Joao Clemente
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature