Re: [Openswan Users] NAT-T in native stack??

To: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
Cc: Lewis Shobbrook <lshobbrook@fasttrack.net.au>, users@lists.openswan.org, debian-testing@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] NAT-T in native stack??
From: Rene Mayrhofer <rene.mayrhofer@gibraltar.at>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 09:10:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 406BC078.3090106@gibraltar.at>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403312148330.22535-100000@expansionpack.xtdnet.nl>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403312148330.22535-100000@expansionpack.xtdnet.nl>

Paul Wouters wrote:

You forgot: nat_traversal=yes ?

Perhaps Rene wants to enable this per default.

Might be an option, but I used to set it off by default because it brokestuff in earlier freeswan releases (where I applied the NAT-T patch). Isit "safe" now, i.e. is _everything_ expected to work with NAT-T being onthat work when it is disabled ?


best regards,
Rene

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Openswan Users] NAT-T in native stack??
  - From: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>

Next by Date: Re: [Openswan Users] NAT-T in native stack??
Next by thread: Re: [Openswan Users] NAT-T in native stack??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread