Re: LBA

To: debian-testing@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LBA
From: ed@ednevitible.co.uk
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 07:46:20 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040406074620.23f810cd.ed@ednevitible.co.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1081206856.546.11.camel@uberjully>
References: <[🔎] 20040405224425.7ec546d9.ed@ednevitible.co.uk> <[🔎] 1081206856.546.11.camel@uberjully>

On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:14:16 +1000
Julian Florance <julian@skunk.homelinux.org> wrote:

> I'm using a 160gb disk in Sid right now without any hassles, on an old
> PII-350mhz/Intel-BX440 mobo. 
> 
> Of course it only yields 157"Gi" due to the good old gigabyte vs
> gibibyte chestnut, but it's certainly a deal better than 137"Gi".

abit kt7 mobo.. and about 5 different debian isos. slack was fine with it

Reply to:

References:
- LBA
  - From: ed@ednevitible.co.uk
- Re: LBA
  - From: Julian Florance <julian@skunk.homelinux.org>

Prev by Date: Cannot boot with cdrom and LVM
Next by Date: Re: GnuCash instability
Previous by thread: Re: LBA
Next by thread: Re: LBA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread