[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#212774: d-i report: problems with part conf, boot loader and a bunch of small things



Package: installation-reports
Version: 2003-09-25
Severity: normal

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 2003-09-25, http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-k7 #1 Sat Sep 6 02:13:04 EST 2003 i686 GNU Linux
Date: 2003-09-25 23:00
Method: How did you install?  What did you boot off?  If network
      install, from where?  Proxied?

I used floppy-image.img to boot and the net_drivers-image.img for a
maximum network install. I did not use a proxy.

Machine: Put together on my own, no name
Processor: AMD Duron 1.3 GHz
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: IDE, /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
Root Size/partition table:  Feel free to paste the full partition
      table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.

root@donald:~$ env LANG=C fdisk -l

Disk /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc: 13.0 GB, 13010264064 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 25209 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes

                                Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1   *           1        2072     1044193+  83  Linux
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2            2072       25198    11655157+   5  Extended
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5            2072        2566      248976   82  Linux swap
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6            2567        4431      939771   83  Linux
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7            4431        4845      208813+  83  Linux
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8            4846        8814     2000061   83  Linux
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part9            8814        9786      489951   83  Linux
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part10           9786       11730      979933+  83  Linux

part5-10 contain my actual working Debian and were not touched during
installation. part1 was used for testing the d-i, it was used as the
root (and only) partition.

Output of lspci:

00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] (rev 81)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133 AGP]
00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 40)
00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586/B/686A/B PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 1a)
00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 1a)
00:07.4 Bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 40)
00:07.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 50)
00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 43)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV5 [RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro] (rev 11)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:    [E] 
Mount partitions:       [E]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [E]
Reboot:                 [O] (with problems)
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
These are the problems/suggestions I have, in the order of appearance:

- language selection should be the first thing to do

- floppy retriever was the only possibility -> no need to ask

- after loading the floppy-retriever, I was offered three modules:
  ethdetect, mirrorchoose and a 3rd I forgot :-( -> theese were needed
  all three, should be selected by default!

- DHCP settings confirmation: <go back> does not work

- keyboard selection: only offered USB and AT, no PS/2 (AT worked,
  though)

- after selecting the mirror, the menu option "execute a shell" is
  preselected -> that should be "load installer modules"; it is
  unclear at this point what to do

- installer modules: _way_ too many options; don't display the libs
  please

- HW detection: a list of detected HW would be nice

- partition configuration: device names are too long, fs to create and
  mount point get invisible

- reiserfs creation is not available, even though I loaded the
  reiserfs tools module

- I did not tell d-i to use the swap partition on part5, however, it
  tried to activate it; d-i should not touch partitions
  it was not told to!

- configuring the partitions a second time fails because the
  partitions are already mounted; they should be unmounted before; in
  addition, d-i tries to activate the already activated swap
  partition a second time, which failed

- download of Packages.gz: slider does not work, stays at 0%

- download of base packages: URL is way too long; please only show the
  file name

- after installing the base system, "install kernel" should be
  preselected, not "configure partitions"

- rebooting after installing the kernel does not work since I am
  forced to install grub or lilo; I already have a working grub for my
  actual system

- trying to install grub on (fd0) fails. I did not want to destroy my
  already working version on (hd0).

- trying to install lilo on /dev/floppy/0 gives an error message, but
  d-i is satisfied nevertheless, thus I could eventually choose
  "finish and reboot"

- when displaying the "finish and reboot" dialog, <go back> does not
  work; you are forced to proceed

- when booting the system the first time and executing base-config,
  no keymap was loaded (I chose "german", "de-latin-nokeadkeys" in
  d-i); this should be respected

All in all, my general impression was that d-i feels more complicated
than b-f. The modular system is a great architecture, but it should be
hidden from end users.

Please feel free to ask about particular details.

BTW: many messages in d-i are not translated to de-de. Do you need
help here?

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt
home:  www.piware.de
eMail: martin@piware.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: