[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problems with lftp-ssl



That's what I thought, but I downloaded the source, I found that debian/rules had --without-ssl 

I changed that and now im using the SSL enabled version.

Do you think I should write the mantainter?

Good luck!

On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 15:54:26 -0400 (EDT)
"Chris Caldwell" <caldwell@gwu.edu> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> I believe the ssl functionality has been rolled into the main
> package since a couple versions ago.
> 
> 
> Chris Caldwell
> 
> Information Systems Coordinator, Enterprise Systems
> Information Systems and Services, The George Washington University
> caldwell@gwu.edu | +1 202.994.4674 (w) | +1 202.409.0878 (c)
> http://hippocrates.tops.gwu.edu | GPG key ID: 0xE52D0BE8
> 
>  --
> 
> "Programming today is a race between software engineers
> striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs
> and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots.
> So far, the universe is winning."
>                                                         - Richard Cook
> 
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Martin Sarsale wrote:
> 
> > Hello!
> >
> > Im trying to install the SSL Enabled version of Lftp but I found that no repositorie has it.
> > I did a google search about 'lftp-ssl' and I found traces of the package on but none of the mirrors have the file ....
> >
> > can somebody explain me what's happening?
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance! :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-testing-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE9ZpMJ1YKAfuUtC+gRApfvAJ0SEspDZji2cJ9/C9oI5M1plme71gCg2mPy
> kJuY0QS3cuvUgoO+mjuEZm0=
> =mdKP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-testing-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> Re



Reply to: