[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug in pcmcia-cs install script?



on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:04:31AM +0100, Frank F?rst (ffrank@rz.uni-potsdam.de) wrote:
> I just did my daily apt-get upgrade, and finally the pcmcia-packages
> also where upgraded, which have always been kept back since I
> dist-upgraded from potato to woody in December. The new version is
> 3.1.31.
> 
> What is at least an annoying wishlist bug, if not more, is that the
> network settings from the old /etc/pcmcia/network.opts have not been
> transfered to the new file, and I was also not asked by debconf to put
> in new values.

It's been considered release critical by Joey Hess, though it may now be
resolved.

> /etc/pcmcia/network.opts contains all the things like IP-adress,
> gateway and nameservers. Of course this file is not from the *.deb, it
> has been created by a script when I first installed the network stuff
> in potato. Then, this script must have asked me for the information
> and put it into the file.
> 
> Now, upon upgrade, debconf informed me that the file from the new
> package differs from the existing file "created by you or a script",
> as usual. What I think it should have done is either parse the old
> file and put the data in the new one (at a first glance, the file
> format seemed very different, however upon closer inspection it was
> only the order and the comments that have changed, not the syntax), or
> rather call again the script that originally created that file.
> 
> As it is now, one has to manually edit the file to get back network
> access. And if the problem persists upon a new installation, some
> configuration script is missing that existed in potato.
> 
> Should I report this as a bug? Can one comment wether this is really a
> problem in pcmcia-cs or elsewhere?

Does:

    http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=133968&repeatmerged=yes

...seem to relate?

If not, there are a few other recently filed bugs to pcmcia-cs.

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>    http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/         http://www.kuro5hin.org

Attachment: pgpMmM9pUxp4B.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: