Re: sawfish/sawmill in woody?
On Sam, Jun 23, 2001 at 02:47:45 -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> writes:
> > > AFAICT, why are neither sawfish nor sawmill in woody? The maintainer
> > > (Christian Marillat) is being uncommunicative.
> > Isn't it time that you figured out how testing works? Have a look at
> > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/
> So instead of assuming that I've ignored the obvious sources of
> information, why not actually help answer the question? I checked
> update_excuses. It says:
> sawfish 0.38-6 (new) (optional) (low)
> Maintainer: Christian Marillat <marillat@debian.org>
> sawfish uploaded 53 days ago, out of date by 43 days!
> valid candidate (will be installed unless it's dependent upon other buggy pkgs)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is the reason:
root@hiwiv513:/usr/local/src/source/sawfish-0.38# dpkg-checkbuilddeps
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev
(>= 0.11.0-1), libgnome-dev (>= 1.2.13-5), libglade-gnome0-dev (>=
0.16-2.1)
Yours Joerg
Reply to: