Re: emacs21
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:15:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Why isn't emacs21 in testing? The update_excuses output says:
> * emacs21 (- to 21.1-7)
> * Maintainer: Rob Browning
> * 18 days old (needed 2 days)
> * emacs21-el/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: emacs21 (= 21.1-7) []
> * out of date on m68k: emacs21 (from 21.1-5)
> * Not considered
> I assume this means that there is no emacs21-el built for m68k.
Actually it means emacs21-el (from the emacs21 source) is arch: all,
but emacs21 (from the emacs21 source) is arch: any and hadn't been built
for m68k since 21.1-5. It was uploaded before dinstall today though,
and as such got processed by the testing scripts today, and will hit
the mirrors tomorrow.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
The daffodils are coming. Are you?
linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia
--- http://www.linux.org.au/conf
Reply to:
- References:
- emacs21
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)