Re: Upgrading procedures (was RE: hamm->potato tested?)

To: "J.A. Bezemer" <costar@panic.et.tudelft.nl>
Cc: debian-testing@lists.debian.org, shaleh@valinux.com, rainer.dorsch@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de
Subject: Re: Upgrading procedures (was RE: hamm->potato tested?)
From: Rainer Dorsch <rainer@rai16.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 14:07:45 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200005101207.OAA01396@rai16.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
In-reply-to: Message from "J.A. Bezemer" <costar@panic.et.tudelft.nl> of "Wed, 10 May 2000 13:34:54 +0200." <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000510132918.30791A-100000@panic.et.tudelft.nl>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000510132918.30791A-100000@panic.et.tudelft.nl>

Thank you for the pointer. I will try it on May 20th from hamm (2.0) to potato.

--Rainer.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-testing-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Upgrading procedures (was RE: hamm->potato tested?)
  - From: "J.A. Bezemer" <costar@panic.et.tudelft.nl>

Prev by Date: Upgrading procedures (was RE: hamm->potato tested?)
Next by Date: Printing task?
Previous by thread: Upgrading procedures (was RE: hamm->potato tested?)
Next by thread: Printing task?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread