[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: slink --> potato -- tetex-base broken



> Slink installed without trouble... the upgrade to potato is breaking on
> tetex-base..

Ah, good.

> Here is a bit of a cut'n'paste:
> Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main tetex-base 1.0-4 [11.0MB]

Ok.  This is the same version I have installed.  I didn't have any problems.
Check to make sure that your download succeeded correctly:

lbscissors% md5sum /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0-4_all.deb 
b7b824f9a4d7afacec82b0bc37bcfd45  /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0-4_all.deb

> Fetched 10.9MB in 2m18s (78.2kB/s)                                             
> Selecting previously deselected package tetex-base.
> (Reading database ... 28838 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace tetex-base 0.9.981113-1 (using
> .../tetex-base_1.0-4_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement tetex-base ...
> 
> And, a ps aux shows these that I think are involved:
> root      1676 16.2 15.0 10064 9412 tty2     D    04:36   9:17 dpkg --unpack
> netstd_3.07-10.deb libpng2_1.0.3-1.deb libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1_2.91.66-2.deb tet ...
> 
> root      4491 11.3 17.6 11692 11056 ttyp0   T    05:33   0:02 /usr/bin/dpkg --unpack /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0-4_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archi
> root      4499  0.1  0.6  1104  424 ttyp0    T    05:33   0:00 dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0-4_all.deb
> root      4500  6.1  0.6  1108  428 ttyp0    T    05:33   0:01 dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0-4_all.deb
> root      4501  3.2  0.6  1348  428 ttyp0    T    05:33   0:00 gzip -dc

Ah, that's interesting.  It never even finishes unpacking.  Which version
of dpkg do you have installed?


What happens when you try:

dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0-4.deb

without going through apt?

Eric


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-testing-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: