Re: consensus on stuff left to be fixed in slink

To: debian-testing@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: consensus on stuff left to be fixed in slink
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 13 Apr 1999 01:05:00 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] oasoa5i003.fsf@burrito.fake>
In-reply-to: "Karl B. Hammar"'s message of "Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:39:28 +0200 (CEST)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990411232459.861A-100000@opal.aspo.lcl>

>>>>> "Karl" == Karl B Hammar <karl@kalle.csb.ki.se> writes:

Karl> I found a patch on
Karl> ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/kernels/people/alan/2.0.37pre/2.0.37/2.0.37-pre-patch-3.gz
Karl> It gives an working kernel, but I don't know if it solves the
Karl> problem.

This seems like the best lead so far... can someone test it?

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-testing-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: consensus on stuff left to be fixed in slink
  - From: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@primenet.com>

References:
- Re: consensus on stuff left to be fixed in slink
  - From: "Karl B. Hammar" <karl@kalle.csb.ki.se>

Prev by Date: Re: OmniORB 2.7.0 *MUST* be moved into stable
Next by Date: Re: consensus on stuff left to be fixed in slink
Previous by thread: Re: consensus on stuff left to be fixed in slink
Next by thread: Re: consensus on stuff left to be fixed in slink
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread