Testing removal summary 2021-09-29 (Wednesday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: bcbio 1.2.5-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 20210927; done 20210929
# r-bioc transition; temporary removals of some "leaf" packages to unblock r-bioc-biogenerics
REMOVED: calamares-settings-debian 11.0.5-2
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #992164: calamares: Creating a new blank partition table GPT/UEFI results in failure
# in calamares
REMOVED: gnome-shell-extension-arc-menu 49-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #993182: gnome-shell-extension-arc-menu: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
REMOVED: gnome-shell-extension-hide-veth 1.0.2-1.1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #993189: gnome-shell-extension-hide-veth: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
REMOVED: gnome-shell-extension-move-clock 1.01-2
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #993191: gnome-shell-extension-move-clock: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
REMOVED: gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd 1.0.50.gc032923-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #993194: gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
REMOVED: gnome-shell-extension-tilix-dropdown 7-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
# 993199,994062
REMOVED: gnome-shell-extension-trash 0.2.0-git20200326.3425fcf1-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #993201: gnome-shell-extension-trash: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40
REMOVED: gnome-shell-extension-xrdesktop 0.14.0-3
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #993065: gnome-shell-extension-xrdesktop: Please update for gnome-shell 40
REMOVED: gnome-shell-pomodoro 0.18.0-0.1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #993063: gnome-shell-pomodoro: Please update to version 0.19.1
REMOVED: pigx-rnaseq 0.0.19-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 20210927; done 20210929
# r-bioc transition; temporary removals of some "leaf" packages to unblock r-bioc-biogenerics
REMOVED: r-bioc-degreport 1.26.0+dfsg-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 20210927; done 20210929
# r-bioc transition; temporary removals of some "leaf" packages to unblock r-bioc-biogenerics
REMOVED: r-bioc-deseq2 1.30.1+dfsg-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 20210927; done 20210929
# r-bioc transition; temporary removals of some "leaf" packages to unblock r-bioc-biogenerics
REMOVED: r-bioc-dexseq 1.36.0+dfsg-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 20210927; done 20210929
# r-bioc transition; temporary removals of some "leaf" packages to unblock r-bioc-biogenerics
REMOVED: r-bioc-htsfilter 1.30.1+dfsg-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 20210927; done 20210929
# r-bioc transition; temporary removals of some "leaf" packages to unblock r-bioc-biogenerics
REMOVED: r-bioc-rgsepd 1.22.0-1
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 20210927; done 20210929
# r-bioc transition; temporary removals of some "leaf" packages to unblock r-bioc-biogenerics
REMOVED: trinityrnaseq 2.11.0+dfsg-6
<https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/sramacher>
# 20210927; done 20210929
# r-bioc transition; temporary removals of some "leaf" packages to unblock r-bioc-biogenerics
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.
Reply to: