[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Testing removal summary 2011-04-01 (Friday)



The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:

  REMOVED: caret 5.6.1.3~dfsg.1-4
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401

  REMOVED: cherokee 1.0.8-5
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110303; done 20110401
    # now to get rid of libavutil49...

  REMOVED: elmerfem 5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg-1
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401
    <http://bugs.debian.org/620241>

  REMOVED: freej 0.10git20100110-1
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110303; done 20110401
    # #606717

  REMOVED: fsl 4.1.7-1
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401

  REMOVED: fslview 3.1.8+4.1.6-2
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401

  REMOVED: ifrit 3.3.2-1
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401
    <http://bugs.debian.org/619916>

  REMOVED: igstk 4.2.0-3
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401
    # need insighttoolkit, #613539

  REMOVED: itksnap 2.0.0+cvs20100615-1
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401
    # need insighttoolkit, #613539

  REMOVED: mayavi2 3.3.2-3
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401

  REMOVED: rheolef 5.92-2
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401
    # 5.93-2 not yet built/aged

  REMOVED: slicer 3.4.0~svn10438-7
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401
    # need insighttoolkit, #613539

  REMOVED: taoframework 2.1.svn20090801-3
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110303; done 20110401

  REMOVED: vtkedge 0.1.0-3
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110331; done 20110401

The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: ball 1.3.2-2
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401
    # and #609960

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: ecb 2.32-1
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401
    # and #620341

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: gadmintools-meta 9
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401
    <http://bugs.debian.org/620352>

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: ipplan 4.92a-2
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: jde 2.3.5.1-5
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401
    # and #620341

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: meta-ggz 0.0.14-1
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401
    <http://bugs.debian.org/620354>

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: prime-el 1.5.1.3-3
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: qtiplot 0.9.8.2-1
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401
    # and #609960

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: samizdat 0.6.2-2
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401
    <http://bugs.debian.org/620357>

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: saods9 4.0b7-2
    <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
    # 20110401

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


Reply to: