Testing removal summary 2008-08-22 (Friday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: btrfs-tools 0.15-2
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/adeodato>
# 2008-08-20; done 2008-08-21
REMOVED: ffmpeg-free 0.svn20080206-8
Package not in unstable
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: emile 0.11-2
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk>
# 20080822
# m68k specific
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: iceowl 0.7-2
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/pkern>
# 20080814
# FTBFS (#483138, #489092)
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libdb4.2-ruby 0.6.2-3
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/adeodato>
# 2008-08-21
# superceded by libdb-ruby
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libdb4.3-ruby 0.6.2-2
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/adeodato>
# 2008-08-21
# superceded by libdb-ruby
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libdb4.4-ruby 0.6.2-1
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/adeodato>
# 2008-08-21
# superceded by libdb-ruby
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: m68k-vme-tftplilo 1.1.3-1
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk>
# 20080822
# m68k specific
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: monotone-viz 0.15-3
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/he>
#20080822
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: tulip 3.0.0~B6-2
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/pkern>
# 20080811
# low popcon, FTBFS in unstable, #479327 (indication that the FTBFS
# also applies to testing), #476008
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team
<debian-release@lists.debian.org> is responsible.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.
Reply to: