Testing removal summary 2008-09-04 (Thursday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: blobandconquer 0.99-1
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/neilm>
# 495531 20080903
REMOVED: deps 0.13-1.1
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/pkern>
# 20080811; done 20080904; mtime 20080811; done 20080904
# only rdep of tulip, low popcon
REMOVED: libroxen-ecms 20000927-8
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk>
REMOVED: libroxen-form 1.0-11
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk>
REMOVED: libwhisker-perl 1.8-2
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: linux-uvc 0.1.0.svn238-1
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: lmbench 3.0-a7-1
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk>
# 20080903
# 496427,470279
REMOVED: tulip 3.0.0~B6-2
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/pkern>
# 20080811; done 20080904; mtime 20080811; done 20080904
# low popcon, FTBFS in unstable, #479327 (indication that the FTBFS
# also applies to testing), #476008
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: gpicview 0.1.9-1
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/neilm>
# gpicview removal #495968, 20080831
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libfile-temp-perl 0.20-1
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/vorlon>
# 20080903
# removal requested
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: libroxen-floatingcode 1.4-9
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk>
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: roxen4 4.5.146-2
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk>
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: udns 0.0.9-2
<http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk>
# 20080830
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team
<debian-release@lists.debian.org> is responsible.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.
Reply to: