Testing removal summary 2007-01-03 (Wednesday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: dballe 2.6-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20070102; done 20070103
Bug #405357: Database functions do not work on 64bit systems
# RoM
REMOVED: libgtk-mozembed-ruby 0.3.1-6
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20061103; done 20061104
Bug #396862: libgtk-mozembed-ruby: FTBFS: checking for xulrunner-gtkmozembed... Ruby/GTK couldn't be initialized ('Cannot open display: ')
# RoM
REMOVED: libmal 0.42-2
Package not in unstable
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: faad2 2.5-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
#20061223
Bug #403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL
Bug #404279: Package unsuitable for release or testing
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: playground-xmms 0.3-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
#20061226
Bug #403978: playground-plugin-xmms doesn't work
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: ruby1.9 1.9.0+20060609-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 2006-12-15
Bug #305065: ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: wengophone 2.0.0~rc5-svn8108-3
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20070103
Bug #405439: Wengophone 2.0 isn't in a releasable shape
# RoM
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Reply to: