Testing removal summary 2007-02-12 (Monday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: camas 1.2.21-2.2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20070211
Bug #407494: caudium: failes to start
REMOVED: libroxen-xmlrpc 20020823-3
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20070211
Bug #407494: caudium: failes to start
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: caudium 2:1.4.9.1-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20070211
Bug #407494: caudium: failes to start
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: ia32-libs-gtk 1.0
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
# 20070212
Bug #406455: libpango1.0-0: 32bit libpango must use /usr/lib32/pango/1.5.0/module-files.d
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: iacd 0.0.26-5.1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 2007-02-13
Bug #410726: RM: iacd -- RoM; abandoned upstream; difficult to configure
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: ruby1.9 1.9.0+20060609-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 2006-12-15
Bug #305065: ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: tidev-modules 2.0.4
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 2007-01-07
Bug #362162: RM: tidev-modules -- RoQA, now part of linux-2.6
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Reply to: